Damian Krzeminski wrote:
>In many places sipXconfig is using a validator that accepts either "dial
>digits" or "sip URIs". I am pretty sure that it can/should be relaxed.
>Please open an issue.
>D.
>
Done. http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-6358 I wasn't sure which
component to put it under,
Keith Gearty wrote:
> Keith Gearty wrote:
>
>> I just found an annoying little bug under User > Call Forwarding. The
>> "forward to" field is supposed to accept any potentially valid SIP
>> extension, but it seems to only accept numeric extensions or fully
>> qualified SIP URIs. If you put in
Keith Gearty wrote:
>I just found an annoying little bug under User > Call Forwarding. The
>"forward to" field is supposed to accept any potentially valid SIP
>extension, but it seems to only accept numeric extensions or fully
>qualified SIP URIs. If you put in a non-numeric extension without
I just found an annoying little bug under User > Call Forwarding. The
"forward to" field is supposed to accept any potentially valid SIP
extension, but it seems to only accept numeric extensions or fully
qualified SIP URIs. If you put in a non-numeric extension without the
SIP domain part, it
