On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:39 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:35 -0400, Dale Worley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:47 -0400, David Saint wrote:
> > > A question came up during our code review as to what functionality the
> > > sipx
> > > users would expect in the followin
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:35 -0400, Dale Worley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:47 -0400, David Saint wrote:
> > A question came up during our code review as to what functionality the
> > sipx
> > users would expect in the following call forward scenerio:
> >
> > Configuration:
> > User 201
> >
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:47 -0400, David Saint wrote:
> A question came up during our code review as to what functionality the
> sipx
> users would expect in the following call forward scenerio:
>
> Configuration:
> User 201
>Extension 201 will ring first for 5 seconds
>If no response
[mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 5:22 PM
To: Jonathan Petersen
Cc: David Saint; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] User expectation for call forward functionality
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:06 -0700, Jonathan Petersen wrote:
> Huh, very in
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Petersen [mailto:jonathan.peter...@ontraonline.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:06 PM
> To: Saint, David (CAR:9D60); sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] User expectation for call forward
> functional
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:06 -0700, Jonathan Petersen wrote:
> Huh, very interesting conundrum indeed...
>
> My first response was that Functionality "B" should be the way it works...
> but after thinking about it for a second I'm not so sure.
>
> If 202 rings an actual phone at a persons desk and
Scott Lawrence wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:06 -0700, Jonathan Petersen wrote:
>> How much work would it be to add a checkbox that acts as an override? So
>> the default behavior would be Functionality "A" specified in the previous
>> message but an admin could still override to achieve Funct
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:06 -0700, Jonathan Petersen wrote:
>
> How much work would it be to add a checkbox that acts as an override? So
> the default behavior would be Functionality "A" specified in the previous
> message but an admin could still override to achieve Functionality "B"?
>
> Jonat
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:47 -0400, David Saint wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A question came up during our code review as to what functionality the
> sipx
> users would expect in the following call forward scenerio:
>
> Configuration:
> User 201
>Extension 201 will ring first for 5 seconds
>If no
n Behalf Of David Saint
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:48 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] User expectation for call forward functionality
Hi,
A question came up during our code review as to what functionality the
sipx
users would expect in the following call forward s
rg
Subject: [sipx-users] User expectation for call forward functionality
Hi,
A question came up during our code review as to what functionality the
sipx
users would expect in the following call forward scenerio:
Configuration:
User 201
Extension 201 will ring first for 5 seconds
If n
Hi,
A question came up during our code review as to what functionality the
sipx
users would expect in the following call forward scenerio:
Configuration:
User 201
Extension 201 will ring first for 5 seconds
If no response forward to 202 ring for 30 seconds
If none of the above answ
12 matches
Mail list logo
