shed some light here?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2009 1:32 a.m.
To: Yakout Esmat
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] VoIP quatlity difference between Asterisk and sipX
On Fri, 2009-05-2
kout Esmat
Sent: Sun 5/24/2009 12:59 AM
To: 'Scott Lawrence'
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] VoIP quatlity difference between Asterisk and sipX
My personal experience, in a lab setup, is that sipX quality is better than
Asterisk when NAT is involved.
But as you
here?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2009 1:32 a.m.
To: Yakout Esmat
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] VoIP quatlity difference between Asterisk and sipX
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 23:32 +1200, Yakout Esmat wrote
...@nortel.com]
Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2009 1:32 a.m.
To: Yakout Esmat
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] VoIP quatlity difference between Asterisk and sipX
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 23:32 +1200, Yakout Esmat wrote:
>
> If we had 2 endpoints separated by NAT, hence media
I have fount the Sipx relay to have little impact on call quality, other than
your typical QOS issues on a low bandwidth internet connection. But thats not
Sipx's fault.
The difference with Asterisk, is that Asterisk transcodes everything to IAX,
where as Sipx is just relaying the traffic.
So
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 23:32 +1200, Yakout Esmat wrote:
>
> If we had 2 endpoints separated by NAT, hence media has to travel
> through the Media Relay agent (the sipX server) would the call quality
> be better than if the same endpoints were using an Asterisk server?
The real answer is probably t
Hi All,
So far we have been avid users of Asterisk-based PBXs with all our clients
running distributions like Trixbox and PIAF.
But now with the release of the new sipX version 4.0, I believe that we have
to revisit our strategies.
I have many questions but let's focus on quality issue
