list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] authorization theoretical question
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> wrote:
> >
> > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
wrote:
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nikolay Kondratyev
> [k...@nstel.ru]
>
> I know that there are many sip gurus in the li
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nikolay Kondratyev
[k...@nstel.ru]
I know that there are many sip gurus in the list...
I encountered the registrar, that uses status 407 in reply to Registe
Hi all,
I know that there are many sip gurus in the list...
I encountered the registrar, that uses status 407 in reply to Register instead
of 401.
What i managed to find out in rfc 3261, is that (if i'm not mistaken) registrar
should use 401.
But what could be the consequences of this misbehaviou