[sipx-users] cfengine and DHCPD

2012-11-30 Thread Kyle Haefner
Hi all, I run dhcp in HA mode on both of my sipx (4.6) servers. I have the service as unmanaged so sipx does not re-write my special configuration. The problem I have is that cfengine removes dhcp from starting in chkconfig on the secondary server (the UI won't let you run dhcp on both nodes).

Re: [sipx-users] cfengine and DHCPD

2012-11-30 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Kyle Haefner kyle.haef...@colostate.edu wrote: I run dhcp in HA mode on both of my sipx (4.6) servers. I have the service as unmanaged so sipx does not re-write my special configuration. The problem I have is that cfengine removes dhcp from starting in

Re: [sipx-users] cfengine and DHCPD

2012-11-30 Thread Douglas Hubler
This might not actually work now that i think about it. Easier fix is to allow dhcpd redundant so you can mark it On but Unmanaged at each site. So do please share your wisdom on redundant dhcpd. On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at

Re: [sipx-users] cfengine and DHCPD

2012-11-30 Thread Kyle Haefner
Hi Duglas, It is super easy. http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/HA+DHCP Thanks! Kyle On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote: This might not actually work now that i think about it. Easier fix is to allow dhcpd redundant so you can mark it On but

Re: [sipx-users] cfengine and DHCPD

2012-11-30 Thread Trevor L Benson
Might be a stretch (for 4.6 at least) but cfengine configuring the failover DHCPD should be easily achievable. I have always wondered about servers inside Branch's. Branches might be a good way to determine clustered or individual DHCPD service. That is of course unless branches have some