Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
CAAHujP7Y+4jsuNFAFC00SSJb5TwwsezXJjZNFR=aep8vpvx...@mail.gmail.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 63899
Message-ID: f99b.4e92d...@forum.sipfoundry.org
Michael
then you would also need to address the CounterPath provisioning aspect,
since it provides your config/access via pin.
On Oct 10, 2011 7:06 AM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com
wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs
Hi All,
Currently the sipXecs will allow pin or password with 1 or more
character..Pin or password with 1 to 3 digit are two small.So as the
improvement sipXconfig should allow pin or password with more than either 4 or
5 to certain characters and should not exceed 12 or 24..
Regards,
I'll respond the same way I did on the dev list (just add a little bit for
clarity)...
I think this needs to be administrator configurable for length and
complexity and also allow whatever from the LDAP side (assuming that the
LDAP system will be enforcing whatever policies there).
Also we have
Hi Michael,
My concern is that password will be too small if its 1to3
characters.But it depends on administrator for password length.May be we
can force them to have password move than certain character..
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 10/7/2011 12:57 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
I'll respond the
I'd say default to 4, let the admin change it to something lower if they'd
like...
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Venkateshwaran T
thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com wrote:
**
Hi Michael,
My concern is that password will be too small if its 1to3
characters.But it depends on
How about the error message if admin tries to give a password less
than 4?
Kumaran T
On 10/7/2011 1:12 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
I'd say default to 4, let the admin change it to something lower if
they'd like...
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Venkateshwaran T
IMHO, only if it is settable in the Admin GUI. What is wrong with giving
the admin a choice as to how they want their system setup?
Just because you want it at 4 doesn't mean somebody isn't trying to replace
another system that allowed for 3.
I don't disagree that more security is good. But at
Thanks for the update Mike.
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 10/7/2011 2:25 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
IMHO, only if it is settable in the Admin GUI. What is wrong with
giving the admin a choice as to how they want their system setup?
Just because you want it at 4 doesn't mean somebody isn't trying to
