Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died - discussion resurrected ...

2011-05-23 Thread M. Ranganathan
Bad idea #1 : Allow for other processes to grab ports in the range reserved for sipXrelay and deal with it on the fly. Reason: Posted already. FAIL configtest if port range is specified in ephemeral range. Bad idea #2: A single port to multiplex all RTP traffic. Would fail for firewalls that ran

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died - discussion resurrected ...

2011-05-23 Thread Michael Picher
A fixed port would probably work best from a firewall perspective. On May 23, 2011 11:58 AM, "Mircea Carasel" wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:37 PM, George Niculae wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm investigating http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9189 so I'm >> resurrecting >> http://thread.gma

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died - discussion resurrected ...

2011-05-23 Thread Mircea Carasel
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:37 PM, George Niculae wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm investigating http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9189 so I'm > resurrecting > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.sipfoundry.general/30441 > discussion... > > I managed to recreate the issue on my machine by

[sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died - discussion resurrected ...

2011-05-23 Thread George Niculae
Hi All, I'm investigating http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9189 so I'm resurrecting http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.sipfoundry.general/30441 discussion... I managed to recreate the issue on my machine by specifying the UDP range 31000 - 44000 and restarting prompted service

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-05 Thread Joe Micciche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just to follow up, it seems that if sipregistrar binds to a lower port than sipxrls, I can set NAT to use all ports up to the sipxrls random high port - apparently sipregistrar binding to a high UDP port does not cause Media Relay to fail with "Port in

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-04 Thread Joegen Baclor
It's not a mystery. The client user agent for RLS is set to grab a random port. mClientUserAgent( PORT_DEFAULT, // sipTcpPort PORT_DEFAULT, // sipUdpPort PORT_DEFAULT, // sipTlsPort NULL, // publicAddress NULL, // defaultUser bindIp, // defaultSipAddress

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-04 Thread Joe Micciche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9189 I'm mystified why this just started happening - any ideas? And while I have a workaround, it is quite crippling to my user base to restrict the RTP range. joe On 11/04/2010 10:41 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote: >

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-04 Thread Joegen Baclor
Hey Joe, Go ahead and create a jira ticket. We've received some info from Ranga that this might have some undesired complications in other parts of the code. We will investigate further and update the issue tracker accordingly. Joegen On Thursday, 04 November, 2010 09:49 PM, Joe Micciche wro

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-04 Thread Joe Micciche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joegen, do you want me to open a case for this or have you already? > This is a one liner fix in the relay code. > > for (int i = config.getPortRangeLowerBound(); i < config > .getPortRangeUpperBound(); i++) { > try { >

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-03 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Joegen Baclor wrote: > This is a one liner fix in the relay code. > > for (int i = config.getPortRangeLowerBound(); i < config >     .getPortRangeUpperBound(); i++) { >     try { >     DatagramSocket sock = new DatagramSocket(i, loca

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-03 Thread Joegen Baclor
This is a one liner fix in the relay code. for (int i = config.getPortRangeLowerBound(); i < config .getPortRangeUpperBound(); i++) { try { DatagramSocket sock = new DatagramSocket(i, localAddr); sock.close(); } catch (Except

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-03 Thread Joegen Baclor
AFAIK, not being able to bind to all ports in the range must not result to a process shutdown of the symmitron. This exception should be benign and the media relay should just go grab the next available port. Do you concur? On Thursday, 04 November, 2010 04:02 AM, Matt White wrote: Are the

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-03 Thread Jeff Gilmore
I'm not sure if the symptoms match exactly, but I ran into a problem like this last year, where the ports were not being released properly. See http://forum.sipfoundry.org/index.php?t=msg&goto=43359&S=6a0a2c7c1ad6dd91dd6f5ea6aad822f6&srch=Error+message+from+sipxBridge#msg_43359 My problem was d

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-03 Thread Joe Micciche
On 11/03/2010 04:04 PM, sipx-users-requ...@list.sipfoundry.org wrote: > Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:02:43 -0400 > From: "Matt White" > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died > To: > Message-ID: <4cd187a202f1c...@firewall.thesummit-grp.com> > Con

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-03 Thread Joe Micciche
To follow up, sipxrls is binding to a udp port that is on the range of our RTP (UDP) ports; which then prevents Media Relay from starting. As a test I've defined 31000 - 44000 for RTP, started services and Media Relay fails. netstat -lnpu: udp0 0 10.11.45.10:35265 0.0.0.0:*

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-03 Thread Matt White
Are there any other corresponding errors in the sipx bridge logs? -M >>> Joe Micciche 11/03/10 3:05 PM >>> Not sure what happened but Media Relay died yesterday. No changes were made to the system. sipXconfig (4.2.1-018971.dhubler 2010-08-21T04:59:18 build34) on CentOS5.5 iso. Under Servers ->

[sipx-users] sipX Media Relay died

2010-11-03 Thread Joe Micciche
Not sure what happened but Media Relay died yesterday. No changes were made to the system. sipXconfig (4.2.1-018971.dhubler 2010-08-21T04:59:18 build34) on CentOS5.5 iso. Under Servers -> Services -> Media Relay: Standard error * log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.sipfound