Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

net) *Sent:* Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:06 PM *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3 Sorry if I've totally overlooked something here. Is the recommendation to go with 3.2.3 Combined and Bootrom 4.2.2 for a fresh Sipx 4.

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

On 5/12/10 2:13 PM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: I was getting a weird error with 3.2.3 combined (application .sld is invalid). I wound up using split and that seemed to work properly. I am using combined (so, I need two files, the 3.2.3 firmware and 4.2.2 boot firmware) worked fine, but

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

[sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3 Sorry if I've totally overlooked something here. Is the recommendation to go with 3.2.3 Combined and Bootrom 4.2.2 for a fresh Sipx 4.2 install? I've searched through the various wikis and can't find anything tha

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

Sorry if I've totally overlooked something here. Is the recommendation to go with 3.2.3 Combined and Bootrom 4.2.2 for a fresh Sipx 4.2 install? I've searched through the various wikis and can't find anything that definitively lists exactly which firmware and bootrom should be used for 4.2. T

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

On 5/12/10 11:20 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: On 5/12/10 11:16 AM, Lazieburd wrote: I don't recall if i used split or not, but I did have a problem with using firmware management in sipxconfig. The expanded file names have can you click on 'devices, device files' and see what the name of

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

On 5/12/10 11:16 AM, Lazieburd wrote: I don't recall if i used split or not, but I did have a problem with using firmware management in sipxconfig. The expanded file names have can you click on 'devices, device files' and see what the name of your active poly file(s) are? that should see

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > just to confirm, from polycom's web site: > > I want the 3.2.3 firmware, right? do I want the SPLIT firmware or the > combined firmware?, and what boot rom firmwa

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

just doublechecking before I bork my phones. this says NOT to use polycom version 3.2.3 on sipx version 4.2.0. But subsequent postings say that sipx 4.2.0 was extensively tested on fw 3.2.3 and to use 3.2.3 on sipx 4.2.0 and NOT to use 3.2.2. (I am trying to solve a NEW problem that cropped up

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

ent.net/gethelp/ - Original Message - From: Picher, Michael To: Francis Tinio ; Tony Graziano Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Sat Apr 17 16:02:20 2010 Subject: RE: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! I'm having that problem with a Polycom 601 with firmware 3.1.3c and 3.2.3.

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

Tony Graziano Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! ok updated via yum update. nice gui interface cahnge. refreshing. however, now my system is not running. I rebooted one phone, and now goes into endless loop and says config error 0x0. On Apr 16,

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

On 4/16/10 4:15 PM, Eric Varsanyi wrote: The 'current' polycom boot rom is spip_ssip_BootROM_4_2_2_release_sig.zip , the current SIP firmware (the application) is spip_ssip_vvx_3_2_3_release_sig_combined.zip . i upgraded 4.04 to 4.2 (needed to manually reboot polycom ONCE) running boot 4

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

The 'current' polycom boot rom is spip_ssip_BootROM_4_2_2_release_sig.zip , the current SIP firmware (the application) is spip_ssip_vvx_3_2_3_release_sig_combined.zip . Polycom provides a package of config files with each release that go 'behind' (further down the viewpath) the files generated

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

> they are aware of it and working on a fix. > > As far as we know right now, this will not be a problem > except with phones that are on networks that significantly > delay responses from the phone (we found it with one of our > remote users who's got a slow DSL link). The symptom you'll > s

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:18 -0400, Francis Tinio wrote: > If we upgrade to 4.2, do we need to use bootrom 3.2.3 for polycom? > That is the latest version for IP500. We've done most of our testing with the 3.2.2 firmware (which is not the same as the bootrom), I believe.

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

If we upgrade to 4.2, do we need to use bootrom 3.2.3 for polycom? That is the latest version for IP500. On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote: > that there are other problems that ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! - warning Re: Polycom 3.2.3

On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:49 -0400, Francis Tinio wrote: > > i'll try to update to 3.2.3 and update sipx to 4.2 again later. I should have put this in the release notes and forgot... There is an outstanding problem with Polycom version 3.2.3 http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XTRN-1046 they a

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

tially common issues. >> >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael >> Scheidell >> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:27 AM >> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> Subject: Re: [si

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

foundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:27 AM > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! > > On 4/16/10 1:17 PM, Francis Tinio wrote: > ok upda

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

On 4/16/10 1:43 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: I would create the default branch. Assign the SBC to it, make sure that any field for system devices that need branch get it assigned and restart services as needed. It looks like I have to go through the users, one at a time and assign them to a br

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

ot of time to work on it today. -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:39 AM To: Todd Hodgen Cc: Michael Scheidell; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! Did you manually reboo

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

:31 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! On 4/16/10 1:39 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Did you manually reboot the phone? > > > > I've seen issues with the "browser" with 4.1x (or later) when you > don;t follow through everywhere and create a branch a

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

On 4/16/10 1:39 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: Did you manually reboot the phone? I've seen issues with the "browser" with 4.1x (or later) when you don;t follow through everywhere and create a branch and assign it. There are options that wouldn't come up until "branch" was addressed in several place

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

On 4/16/10 1:35 PM, Francis Tinio wrote: reverted back to 4.0.4. will try again tonight when office is closed lol anyway, did you have to do anything in particular to get the update? or in the config files, like reinstall config files of the phones? yes, just for fun, sent profiles to

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

o it.  This is just an FYI in case > others are having issue, you will know my potentially common issues. > > > > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Scheidell > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

can anyone send me their repo file for centos? I'm running centos 5.2 (installed initial server via sipxecs ISO 4.0.2 or 4.0.3). wehn I initially ran yum update I was getting file not founds for the centos mirrors so had to manually change. On Apr 16, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Francis Tinio wrote

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

reverted back to 4.0.4. will try again tonight when office is closed lol anyway, did you have to do anything in particular to get the update? or in the config files, like reinstall config files of the phones? On Apr 16, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > On 4/16/10 1:17 PM, Fran

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

Of Michael Scheidell Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:27 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! On 4/16/10 1:17 PM, Francis Tinio wrote: ok updated via yum update. nice gui interface cahnge. refreshing. however, now my system is not running. I re

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

On 4/16/10 1:17 PM, Francis Tinio wrote: ok updated via yum update. nice gui interface cahnge. refreshing. however, now my system is not running. I rebooted one phone, and now goes into endless loop and says config error 0x0. mine went fine, centos5, it sent profiles 'automatically' to

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

7 >> >> Helpdesk Contract Customers: >> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ >> >> - Original Message - >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >> >> To: mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com >> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

t; > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > - Original Message - > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > > To: mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com > Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Sent: Fri Apr 16 11:59:38 2010 > Subject: Re: [sipx-use

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 10:44 -0500, Josh Patten wrote: > Any update on the 64 bit build? I don't expect we'll have that posted any earlier than the middle of next week ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

omers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ - Original Message - From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org To: mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Fri Apr 16 11:59:38 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! 32bit. On Apr 16, 2010,

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

Sent: Fri Apr 16 11:56:48 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! we are in 4.0.2 I see update 4.2.0 available. However, when we try to update via sipx panel, it reboots but does not update. On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > Any update on the 64 bit bu

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

32bit. On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote: > Are you running 64 bit or 32 bit? > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > -Original Message- > From: Francis Tinio > Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:56:48 > To: Josh Patten > Cc: > Subjec

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

Are you running 64 bit or 32 bit? Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Francis Tinio Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:56:48 To: Josh Patten Cc: Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! ___ sipx-users mailing list

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

my bad it's 4.0.4. It's not updating to 4.2 via sipx gui. On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Francis Tinio wrote: > we are in 4.0.2 I see update 4.2.0 available. However, when we try to > update via sipx panel, it reboots but does not update. > > > On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Josh Patten

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

we are in 4.0.2 I see update 4.2.0 available. However, when we try to update via sipx panel, it reboots but does not update. On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > Any update on the 64 bit build? > Josh Patten > Assistant Network Administrator > Brazos County IT Dept. > (979)

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

Any update on the 64 bit build? Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 On 4/15/2010 4:05 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: On 4/15/2010 3:42 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote: At this time we don't have 64 bit rpms built (those build servers got turn

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

ckBerry from T-Mobile >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Josh Patten >>> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:54:09 >>> To: >>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! >>> >>>

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

t;> I don't need the ISO either. If it is hardware resources or man hours needed >> to help get these created, I would be glad to help. >> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Josh Patten >> Date: Thu, 15 Apr

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

Berry from T-Mobile > > -Original Message- > From: Josh Patten > Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:54:09 > To: > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released ! > > ___ > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

I don't need the ISO either. If it is hardware resources or man hours needed to help get these created, I would be glad to help. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Josh Patten Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:54:09 To: Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Rel

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

+1 I use all 64 bit CentOS on my server. I don't care if there is an ISO as I prefer to do the OS install myself. Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 On 4/15/2010 4:05 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: On 4/15/2010 3:42 PM, Scott Lawrence

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

On 4/15/2010 3:42 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote: At this time we don't have 64 bit rpms built (those build servers got turned off a while ago for some reason - we'll try to get them back on line soon. There are not and will not be 64bit ISO images, and I suggest using 32bit for any new systems). T

[sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.0 Released !

Build 4.2.0-018575 is posted and stable! This release resolves over 900 issues - some of the highlights are listed below. XMPP – Instant Messaging Server * [XX-4825] - Integration with XMPP * [XX-6519] - Manage server-to-server federation for OpenFire server