Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.1 behind one-to-one NAT

2010-07-12 Thread WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
The critical thing is that the sipXecs host must see DNS records that map its SIP domain to its *internal* address. Hosts outside the NAT should see DNS records that map the SIP domain to the *external* address. This sort of DNS configuration is commonly called "split DNS". Dale _

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.1 behind one-to-one NAT

2010-07-10 Thread Tony Graziano
Sipxecs should run a caching only dns server or have access to one on its private network that will resolve its records properly. If it has a private IP address and resolves it's DNS "to itself" but gets a public IP address, IT WILL NEVER WORK. You are better off to reinstall and let it be its ow

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.1 behind one-to-one NAT

2010-07-09 Thread Tony Graziano
Sip should runa caching only dns server or have access to one on its private network that will reokve its records properly. On 7/9/10, Gawin Dapper wrote: > I am trying to get sipXecs 4.2.1, 64 bit, working behind my router. > The sipx machine does not run DHCP and DNS. > > The internal IP addres

[sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2.1 behind one-to-one NAT

2010-07-09 Thread Gawin Dapper
I am trying to get sipXecs 4.2.1, 64 bit, working behind my router. The sipx machine does not run DHCP and DNS. The internal IP address (10.0.0.2) is specified in the server settings under the Configure tab. The public IP address (1.2.3.4) is specified in the server settings under the NAT tab. My