> work. Even if I try to go from 4.2.1 to the "beta" 4.4, I don't know if it
> will upgrade smoothly or not, but it would not be a production system.
Thanks, that's exactly what I was wondering about in terms of 'test' versions.
Mike
___
sipx-users mai
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:51 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> > There are still outstanding bugs
>
> When installing a 'testing' server, as fixes come out, can one continue to
> update it all the way to a production server?
> In other words, is it safe to take these builds test it while using it
> m
> There are still outstanding bugs
When installing a 'testing' server, as fixes come out, can one continue to
update it all the way to a production server?
In other words, is it safe to take these builds test it while using it mainly
as dev of course, but keep updating it until it's stable or is
I will upload them tonight. I noticed build didn't include them and I meant
to upload them
On Jan 8, 2011 7:37 AM, "Matt White" wrote:
Douglas Hubler 01/07/11 11:58 PM >>>
>>>There are still outstanding bugs
>>>
> >>http://bit.ly/gCCsCX
>>>
>>>CentOS repo file
>
> Are the srpm's available? I
>>> Douglas Hubler 01/07/11 11:58 PM >>>
>>There are still outstanding bugs
>>
>>http://bit.ly/gCCsCX
>>
>>CentOS repo file
Are the srpm's available? I'm using srpms from about 2 weeks ago for the SuSe
builds and I'd like to update them.
___
sipx
There are still outstanding bugs
http://bit.ly/gCCsCX
CentOS repo file
http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/sipx-4.4.0-centos.repo
ISO (look for file labeled 4.4.0)
http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/ISO/
(ignore openacd ones, they are slated for next release) but we've done
o