Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-31 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Martin, On Jul 31, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Le 31/07/12 18:36, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit : >> My personal 2c is that if folks are doing any of the following enough: >> >> * adding patches >> * creating JIRA issues >> * having thoughtful discussion on list >> * w

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-31 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Le 31/07/12 18:36, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit : My personal 2c is that if folks are doing any of the following enough: * adding patches * creating JIRA issues * having thoughtful discussion on list * writing documentation * answering user questions or being generally "interested" in the p

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-31 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Martin, On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Just a note: a few mails ago, they were a mention about granting commit > rights. Actually I would suggest a slightly different approach. We don't need > commit rights, at least not directly. If the SIS project goes ahead with

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-31 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Martin, On Jul 31, 2012, at 4:09 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Hello Chris > > Le 31/07/12 03:55, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit : >> Before we create a utils package, I like to find classes that don't fit in >> any of the other >> categories. Do you have some ideas as to what would fit

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-31 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Just a note: a few mails ago, they were a mention about granting commit rights. Actually I would suggest a slightly different approach. We don't need commit rights, at least not directly. If the SIS project goes ahead with a Git repository, then we only need to clone that Git repository on our

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-31 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Chris Le 31/07/12 03:55, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit : Before we create a utils package, I like to find classes that don't fit in any of the other categories. Do you have some ideas as to what would fit into here now? Example of things in the utilities modules are: * Specialized c

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-30 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Thanks for these links, Martin. Cheers, Chris On Jul 30, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Hello Adam > > Le 31/07/12 01:20, Adam Estrada a écrit : >> Where in your code is the geometry support? I need a heads up on where to >> find it. > > In the "pending" source code repository

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-30 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Martin, On Jul 30, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Hello Chris > > Le 30/07/12 19:50, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit : >> OK to clarify, OSGeo will discuss this issue at their board meeting on 8/9? > Yes, I will keep this list informed. > > >> Sure feel free to start thread

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-30 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Adam Le 31/07/12 01:20, Adam Estrada a écrit : Where in your code is the geometry support? I need a heads up on where to find it. In the "pending" source code repository of Geotk, directory modules/geometry. However this particular topic is still work in progress, both on our side and

Re: Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-30 Thread Adam Estrada
Hey Martin, Where in your code is the geometry support? I need a heads up on where to find it. Thanks! Adam On Jul 30, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Hello Chris > > Le 30/07/12 19:50, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit : >> OK to clarify, OSGeo will discuss this issue at their

Grouping modules in categories

2012-07-30 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Chris Le 30/07/12 19:50, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit : OK to clarify, OSGeo will discuss this issue at their board meeting on 8/9? Yes, I will keep this list informed. Sure feel free to start threads here on sis-dev@ to discuss your thoughts. I saw the 5 modules in the root direct