Hi Andrea,
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2007 04:09, Andrea Righi a écrit :
> Honestly I don't know which is the best solution... IMHO starting rsyncd
> and monitord without an explicit action from the user could lead to
> security issues (exposing the availability of the images before any
> customizatio
Geoffroy Vallée wrote:
> Le mardi 16 octobre 2007 16:12, Andrea Righi a écrit :
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> In trunk all the init scripts are included into Debian packages with the
>>> --no-start option. I agree that it fixes few issues but do we really want
>>> users to manuall
Geoffroy Vallée wrote:
> Le mardi 16 octobre 2007 16:39, Andrea Righi a écrit :
>> Andrea Righi wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The patch is in attachment. Note that i think i have write access to
trunk so if you think the patch is acceptable, i can check it in.
>>> Very
> you know to proceed with the check in the trunk.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Andrea
>
> Geoffroy, I've read the following mail only now. Does it means that I can
> stop to test your patch right?
I guess so. Dann proved that my patch does not make much sense. Sorry abou
Le mardi 16 octobre 2007 16:12, Andrea Righi a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In trunk all the init scripts are included into Debian packages with the
> > --no-start option. I agree that it fixes few issues but do we really want
> > users to manually start the daemons (becau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In trunk all the init scripts are included into Debian packages with the
> --no-start option. I agree that it fixes few issues but do we really want
> users
> to manually start the daemons (because i guess that at the end they will have
> to
> do so)?
>
>
Hi all,
In trunk all the init scripts are included into Debian packages with the
--no-start option. I agree that it fixes few issues but do we really want users
to manually start the daemons (because i guess that at the end they will have to
do so)?
Just a question i asked to myself comparing De
Le lundi 15 octobre 2007 15:54, dann frazier a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:31:24AM -0400, Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> > You have to write a script that cleans up the system and execute it at
> > package removal time.
> >
> > Also note that the "rule" file deals with the initrd-template in the
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:31:24AM -0400, Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> You have to write a script that cleans up the system and execute it at
> package
> removal time.
>
> Also note that the "rule" file deals with the initrd-template in the
> binary-arch section, which is the section for arch depen
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:01:01PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> >>> Hi Dann,
> >>>
> >>> The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent packag
Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> On Saturday 13 October 2007, Andrea Righi wrote:
>> Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
>>> On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
> The problem is that initrd-template is a arch indep
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> >>> Hi Dann,
> >>>
> >>> The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent package but
> >>> d
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> >>> Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Hi Geoffroy,
> >>>
> I had a quick look at th
Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
>>> Hi Dann,
>>>
>>> The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent package but
>>> does include ELF binaries. The package must be (i think) arch in
Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
>>> Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
Hi all,
>>> Hi Geoffroy,
>>>
I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk, on x86_64. It
looks pretty good. Th
On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> > Hi Dann,
> >
> > The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent package but
> > does include ELF binaries. The package must be (i think) arch independent
> > (it may be u
On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> >
> > Hi Geoffroy,
> >
> > > I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk, on x86_64. It
> > > looks pretty good. The only issues i saw
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
> The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent package but does
> include ELF binaries. The package must be (i think) arch independent (it may
> be used on other architectures to boot up x86_64 clients)
T
Le vendredi 12 octobre 2007 17:11, dann frazier a écrit :
> > I know :-( and I've no idea how to resolve... the point is that all the
> > binaries in the initrd_template must be not used in practice in the
> > distribution, but they'll be used only by BOEL during the installation.
> > So the initrd
Hi Andrea,
i had a look at the problem for the package systemimager-initrd-template and i
think i know what is the problem. A arch independent package should not
include binaries, i.e., ELF files (typically, the result of the command file
should not be ELF). So we have a simple solution: do som
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
> > Hi all,
> Hi Geoffroy,
>
> >
> > I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk, on x86_64. It looks
> > pretty good. The only issues i saw are:
> > - it does not use the Debian kernel, i think thi
Hi Andrea,
Le vendredi 12 octobre 2007 12:45, Andrea Righi a écrit :
> Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi Geoffroy,
>
> > I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk, on x86_64. It
> > looks pretty good. The only issues i saw are:
> > - it does not use the Debian kernel, i think
Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Geoffroy,
>
> I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk, on x86_64. It looks
> pretty good. The only issues i saw are:
> - it does not use the Debian kernel, i think this is not compliant with the
> Debian policies,
This statement sounds to me a
Hi all,
I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk, on x86_64. It looks
pretty good. The only issues i saw are:
- it does not use the Debian kernel, i think this is not compliant with the
Debian policies,
- one package has a lot of issues: systemimager-initrd-template
- few packages h
24 matches
Mail list logo
