Re: [Sisuite-users] Systemimager incremental updates and process accounting

2005-07-06 Thread Andrew D. Fant
Thanks Mark. I knew it was probably something simple, but my brain has been turning into tapioca pudding lately. Andy Mark Ferlatte wrote: > I'm using Debian, so: > > My clients have /var/account/* in their > /etc/systemimager/updateclient.exclude. > > I have a small wrapper script around si_

Re: [Sisuite-users] Systemimager incremental updates and process accounting

2005-07-06 Thread Mark Ferlatte
I'm using Debian, so: My clients have /var/account/* in their /etc/systemimager/updateclient.exclude. I have a small wrapper script around si_getimage that feeds it an exclude file (/etc/systemimager/getimage.exclude), which would have /var/account/* in it (so the upload doesn't have the acct fil

[Sisuite-users] Systemimager incremental updates and process accounting

2005-07-06 Thread Andrew D. Fant
Evening all, Does anyone else out there have process accounting running on systems being imaged by systemimager? I'm trying to work out all the settings that need to be configured to make sure that the golden-client's pacct file doesn't step on the one on other clients when I push out updates.

Re: [Sisuite-users] Time problem with SI

2005-07-06 Thread David_Rosala
4 days? Wow something isn't right because it has only been 12970 days since UTC. Check out your .master script in /scripts. At the very least you can edit it and perform a tune2fs on your partitions after you lay down a filesystem. Example. echo "mkdir -p /a/opt || shellout" mkdir

[Sisuite-users] Time problem with SI

2005-07-06 Thread cc
Hi, I've got some problems with time while deploying image with SI. I created an image, time is correct. When I deploy this image, fsck tells it didn't check filesystem for 4 days and of course launch a fsck. When I log in, time is correct, cause I use ntpdate juste before. The phenomenon appe