On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:28 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> Look, I give up. You really really want to register it. It's cool to
> register stuff. Go ahead. I can't stop you.
No I don't want to it was just an idea, and I've already gave up
before. Just wanted to add that numbers are not only a
On Feb 3, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 08:35 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
Port 11370 is not user visible.
Portnumbers aren't just for end user visible standard-ports...
Look, I give up. You really really want to register it. It's cool to
register st
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 08:35 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> Port 11370 is not user visible.
Portnumbers aren't just for end user visible standard-ports...
Regards,
--
Christoph Anton Mitterer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
m...@christoph.anton.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi list !
I'm Gab and my sksd is gone live . Always looking for peers to gossip with
> hkp://pgp.gabrix.ath.cx:11370/
Ad to your membership !!!
Gab
- --
Home Page = http://www.gabrix.ath.cx/
Key ID = 1024D/80231A90 2008-07-01
Key fingerprint = 54
On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:00 AM, Andy Ruddock wrote:
David Shaw wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Also, isn't the port changeable on a per-peer basis in SKS? If so,
there is no point in registering the port at all, as setting up a
new
peer is a manual operation.
