-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.03.2012 00:46, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 03/25/2012 05:53 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> Did a few more changes[0] to speed up the IP lookup process, and
>> included adding IPv6 for some subset pools (including the HA
>> one)
>
> Hm,
On 03/25/2012 05:53 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
Did a few more changes[0] to speed up the IP lookup process, and
included adding IPv6 for some subset pools (including the HA one)
Hm, just looking for the regular IPv4 A records for the HA pool from
different authoritative nameservers seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.03.2012 11:49, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2012-03-19 at 21:11 +0100, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> Here you go!
>
>> Added ha.pool. The HTTP Server code is available at e.g.
>> http://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/keys.kfwebs.net . Atm I'm
>>
Hello everyone!
A new SKS 1.1.2 keyserver is now running in southern Germany at
http://keyserver.veloxis.de:11371 and :80, on IPv4 and IPv6, behind an nginx
reverse proxy. It is supposed to be a long-term addition to the pool, and
I'll need some peerings to get started. I'm currently running a wee
Hello everyone!
A new SKS 1.1.2 keyserver is now running in southern Germany at
http://keyserver.veloxis.de:11371 and :80, on IPv4 and IPv6, behind an nginx
reverse proxy. It is supposed to be a long-term addition to the pool, and
I'll need some peerings to get started. I'm currently running a wee
On Mar 25, 2012, at 2:07 AM, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2012-03-24 at 21:08 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> I question the analysis (but not what is observed).
>
> I do too. I've no idea why this is happening, which is why the summary
> is so vague. But I'm not an SKS developer.
>
> My best gu
Am 24.03.2012 23:26, schrieb Phil Pennock:
> Virtual Machine issues
>
> There are some issues with clock-keeping mechanisms in some virtual
> machines (VMs) affecting the Berkeley DB used for PTrees; if the clock
> resolution is too low, multiple entries occur at the same timestamp
> and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2012-03-24 at 21:08 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> I question the analysis (but not what is observed).
>
> I do too. I've no idea why this is happening, which is why the summary
> is so vague. But I'm not an SKS dev
