Gabor Kiss wrote:
>> > So, my requests:
>> >
>> >1. Source code
>> >2. Change of name
>> >3. An end to all this useless squabbling
>
>> I would like to support this idea wholeheartedly.
>
> Me too. Not necessarily in this order.
One addition:
4. Remove slanderous^W libelous pe
Gabor Kiss wrote:
>> > So, my requests:
>> >
>> >1. Source code
>> >2. Change of name
>> >3. An end to all this useless squabbling
>
>> I would like to support this idea wholeheartedly.
>
> Me too. Not necessarily in this order.
One addition:
4. Remove slanderous personal atta
> > So, my requests:
> >
> > 1. Source code
> > 2. Change of name
> > 3. An end to all this useless squabbling
> I would like to support this idea wholeheartedly.
Me too. Not necessarily in this order.
Gabor
___
Sks-devel mailing list
On 05/15/2012 03:55 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
[...]
So, my requests:
1. Source code
2. Change of name
3. An end to all this useless squabbling
Hi,
I would like to support this idea wholeheartedly.
D.
--
NAME:Dinko.kreator.Korunic DISCLAIMER:Standard.disclaim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 5/14/2012 9:41 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> I hereby inquire as to the availability of source code for your
> release.
Although I'm neither an SKS maintainer nor a Debian SKS administrator, I
have to say the lack of source code confuses me. There a
On 2012-05-14 at 09:57 +0200, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
> you can find it right here:
>
> http://key-server.org/sks/
(1) In compliance with the GPL,
(2) as a contributor of code under the GPL license which has been
included
On 2012-05-14 at 09:57 +0200, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
> you can find it right here:
>
> http://key-server.org/sks/
(1) In compliance with the GPL,
(2) as a contributor of code under the GPL license which has been
included
Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
> you can find it right here:
>
> http://key-server.org/sks/
>
> The "You talk, we work" release:
Exiting. How exciting!
Yes, but while talking and discussing changes to be made with the ent
Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
> you can find it right here:
>
> http://key-server.org/sks/
>
> The "You talk, we work" release:
Exiting. How exciting! Does it run long before exiting?
Yes, but while talking and discussin
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> On May 14, 2012, at 4:21 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
>> That would be Debian or Ubuntu, and any others based on that work. I
>> have not seen a FHS patch from the RPM based distributions.
>
> Peter Pramberger's RPM packaging in Fedora has/had some tasteful FHS
> patches if you
On May 14, 2012, at 4:21 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
>
> That would be Debian or Ubuntu, and any others based on that work. I have not
> seen a FHS patch from the RPM based distributions.
>
Peter Pramberger's RPM packaging in Fedora has/had some tasteful FHS patches if
you
want/need same for RPM b
On May 14, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
>
> Seeing how this is causing confusion, I wonder if it would be wise to take
> these 'rogue' servers out of the pool?
>
The pubkeys in SKS key servers are oblivious to distro politics as well
as hosting, bandwidth, attitudes, FHS and even O
Jens Leinenbach wrote:
> Hi Edson,
>
> Just to give a substantive answer:
There is NO SKS version 1.1.4. There is an offshoot binary-only build for
AMD64 by a couple users with a prematurely bumped version number. The
closest thing to a real 1.1.4 is 1.1.3-1e8897a5f5f4.
> SKS versions 1.1.1 to 1
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:40:29PM -0300, Edson wrote in
:
Hello guys,
Looking at http://sks-keyservers.net/status/ i see some servers
running SKS server version 1.1.4.
Than i looked to
http://code.google.com/p/sks-keyserver/source/browse/VERSION to check
if i missed a new release of SKS server
2012/5/14 Jens Leinenbach :
> Hi Edson,
>
> Just to give a substantive answer:
>
> SKS versions 1.1.1 to 1.1.3 searches and puts really everything in one
> "base" directory which is incompatible for all Linux distributions that
> insist in properly set directories.
>
> If you have your logfiles in
On May 14, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Jens Leinenbach wrote:
> Hi Edson,
>
> Just to give a substantive answer:
>
All bow to to substance … no karma for you.
> SKS versions 1.1.1 to 1.1.3 searches and puts really everything in one
> "base" directory which is incompatible for all Linux distributions th
Hi Edson,
Just to give a substantive answer:
SKS versions 1.1.1 to 1.1.3 searches and puts really everything in one
"base" directory which is incompatible for all Linux distributions that
insist in properly set directories.
If you have your logfiles in /var/log/sks, then you already use a
patche
On May 14, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> 1.1.4 seems to be the pet project of a Debian developer with an attitude
> problem.
-^^^
I've been asked by a Borg privately to retract the mis-attribution of "Debian".
Done.
73 de
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 13:45 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> of a Debian developer
AFAIK, neither Sebastian nor Jens are Debian Developers.
(see http://db.debian.org/)
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Sks-devel m
On May 14, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Edson Brandi wrote:
>
> Is version 1.1.4 a fork of sks project?
>
1.1.4 seems to be the pet project of a Debian developer with an attitude
problem.
Changing FHS paths isn't exactly "development" no matter how
much hype is involved, "fork" is a premature ejaculati
Hello guys,
Looking at http://sks-keyservers.net/status/ i see some servers
running SKS server version 1.1.4.
Than i looked to
http://code.google.com/p/sks-keyserver/source/browse/VERSION to check
if i missed a new release of SKS server, but i see that source code in
repository still in version 1
Hi,
Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
you can find it right here:
http://key-server.org/sks/
The "You talk, we work" release:
1.1.4
- Introduced new path variables to make SKS FHS compatible:
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/lsb/fhs
22 matches
Mail list logo
