Re: [Sks-devel] Something broken?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 19/11/16 04:16, Michael Jones wrote: > On 18/11/16 23:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 11/19/2016 12:43 AM, Valentin Sundermann wrote: Hi, >> Do you mind me asking how you got those charts on your >> page? Tried the Github

Re: [Sks-devel] Something broken?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 18/11/16 23:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 11/19/2016 12:43 AM, Valentin Sundermann wrote: >>> Hi, > Do you mind me asking how you got those charts on your > page? Tried the Github files linked to at the bottom but > they only

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS and containers

On 11/18/2016 8:09 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Jeremy T. Bouse dijo [Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:29:12PM -0500]: >> I'm just curious if anyone has looked at running SKS within >> containers using Docker? I've seen a couple images on the Docker hub >> that appear to be based on Alpine Linux but was

Re: [Sks-devel] Something broken?

On 11/19/2016 12:43 AM, Valentin Sundermann wrote: > Hi, >> Do you mind me asking how you got those charts on your page? Tried the >> Github files linked to at the bottom but they only appear to give me a >> different key search page. > Oh, I could have known that this leads to confusion. I

Re: [Sks-devel] Something broken?

On 11/17/2016 11:28 AM, Valentin Sundermann wrote: > Hey, > >> Obviously I need to resolve the peer timeout issue but any advice how I >> might speed up the gossip process in general? I've noticed looking at >> the stats that the new/updated keys seem to come in bursts during a >> window between

[Sks-devel] SKS and containers

I'm just curious if anyone has looked at running SKS within containers using Docker? I've seen a couple images on the Docker hub that appear to be based on Alpine Linux but was curious if anyone on here had attempted. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Sks-devel] Something broken?

On 17/11/2016 5:28 pm, Valentin Sundermann wrote: > Best regards, > Valentin Sundermann > > > [1] https://keys.vsund.de/stats/ > > Do you mind me asking how you got those charts on your page? Tried the Github files linked to at the bottom but they only appear to give me a different key search

Re: [Sks-devel] Unreachable status (still) for pgp.key-server.io

On 18/11/2016 10:35 am, Kim Minh Kaplan wrote: > The DNS server does respond but it is *not* responsive (not quick > enough) over TCP. > > $ dig +norecurse +noall +stats @66.33.206.206 pgp.key-server.io > ;; Query time: 133 msec > ;; SERVER: 66.33.206.206#53(66.33.206.206) > ;;

Re: [Sks-devel] Unreachable status (still) for pgp.key-server.io

On 11/18/2016 11:35 AM, Kim Minh Kaplan wrote: > $ dig +norecurse +noall +stats +tcp +time=20 @66.33.206.206 > pgp.key-server.io > ;; Query time: 14056 msec > ;; SERVER: 66.33.206.206#53(66.33.206.206) Still better than me not getting there at all: $ traceroute 66.33.206.206

Re: [Sks-devel] Unreachable status (still) for pgp.key-server.io

Danny Horne wrote: > On 18/11/2016 8:29 am, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> http://dnsviz.net/d/pgp.key-server.io/dnssec/ >> >> "key-server.io zone: The server(s) were not responsive to queries over >> TCP. (66.33.206.206)" >> > > https://intodns.com/key-server.io > > 'OK. Seems all your DNS

Re: [Sks-devel] Unreachable status (still) for pgp.key-server.io

On 18/11/2016 8:29 am, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > http://dnsviz.net/d/pgp.key-server.io/dnssec/ > > "key-server.io zone: The server(s) were not responsive to queries over > TCP. (66.33.206.206)" > https://intodns.com/key-server.io 'OK. Seems all your DNS servers allow TCP connections. This

Re: [Sks-devel] Unreachable status (still) for pgp.key-server.io

On 11/18/2016 05:15 AM, Carles Tubio Terrón wrote: > El Sun, 6 Nov 2016 15:58:43 + > Danny Horne escrigué: > >> On 06/11/2016 2:57 pm, Carles Tubio Terrón wrote: >>> Thank you Moritz and Danny, >>> Im so sorry, i was investigating and had the service down at that >>>