On 2017-06-05 at 00:31 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> which is used in cryptokit, which brings up the question of not
> embedding it in [2]
Sounds sane to me.
For clarity, the only part of the PR which touches cryptokit is an
update to the `.hgignore` file, to exclude the extracted files s
On 06/05/2017 12:08 AM, Phil Pennock wrote:
> No problems with cryptokit for me, using 1.7. I see from Mercurial
> commit-log that this doesn't build with older versions of OCaml. It
> looks like this comes down to being willing to specify which version
> ranges of the OCaml releases we're suppos
On 2017-06-04 at 17:41 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> Should be a pull request against the main repo for that. The
> build-cleaner patches are likely most interesting, and dkg has some work
> on it already.
Ah, didn't know we'd switched to a PR model.
https://bitbucket.org/skskeyserver/sks
On 06/04/2017 03:26 AM, Phil Pennock wrote:
> So we have newer-OCaml cleanup in the first branch "build-cleaner" and
> then some desirable feature changes in a subordinate branch
> "opt-long-keyids".
>
> Anyone with commit on the main repo want to consider merging these?
Should be a pull request
