Re: [Sks-devel] SKS apocalypse mitigation

2018-03-25 Thread Hendrik Visage
> On 26 Mar 2018, at 01:39 , Michael Jones wrote: > > What if the approach was to either have a web of trust to whitelist users > able to upload images, or even more stringent strip all image data. > > Is image data essential to operating? > I’d make the case, that it might actually be not

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS apocalypse mitigation

2018-03-25 Thread Michael Jones
What if the approach was to either have a web of trust to whitelist users able to upload images, or even more stringent strip all image data. Is image data essential to operating? I hardly ever look at the images, and these images could be shared via other means. The keyservers would continue to

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS apocalypse mitigation

2018-03-25 Thread brent s.
On 03/25/2018 07:39 AM, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > >> On 25 Mar 2018, at 03:37, Phil Pennock wrote: >> >> Disappearance of >> public keyservers would be a major inconvenience, but not a disaster. > > Considering that keyservers are currently the only resilient way to > distribute key revocations

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS apocalypse mitigation

2018-03-25 Thread Andrew Gallagher
> On 25 Mar 2018, at 03:37, Phil Pennock wrote: > > Disappearance of > public keyservers would be a major inconvenience, but not a disaster. Considering that keyservers are currently the only resilient way to distribute key revocations, I’m not sure I would be so sanguine. If I’m hosting my ke