-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 14:28 +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 27/05/2019 12:47, deloptes wrote:
> > it is a matter of an agreement between the person and the authority
> > hosting the information of the public key
>
> This is the problem though:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 11:42 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 08:27 -0700, Sparr wrote:
> > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net does not seem to resolve currently,
> > from public or local or whois-authoritative nameserver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 08:27 -0700, Sparr wrote:
> hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net does not seem to resolve currently,
> from public or local or whois-authoritative nameservers.
There's also been quite a few DNSSEC validation errors for RSIGs, for some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 00:22 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> I've been fighting with this for a several days now... Anyone else
> out there seeing this behavior or if not and have similar resourced
> servers care to share details to see if I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 15:15 +0100, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
> and no further action will be taken from them.
..at this time. IANAL, but you should really talk to a lawyer to make sure
that you (and your assets) are fully protected from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 22:33 -0800, Todd Fleisher wrote:
> If I understand your statement, if you are trying to remove bad data from a
> key that’s already in the network that is not possible. Once it’s in the
> network you can only append new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 16:29 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> On 3/6/2019 12:01 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 11:44 -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:57:58AM -0500, Jim Popovitch wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 11:44 -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:57:58AM -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > What are some investigative techniques to determine how my GPG key was
> &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 17:49 +0300, fuat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for peers for a new SKS keyserver installation.
>
> I am running SKS version 1.1.6, on sks.teknoloji360.com.
> The server is physically located in Turkey (TR).
> The machine has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello!
What are some investigative techniques to determine how my GPG key was
corrupted.
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-key
0x3F1C1EF2E6019EAC646CE45227155EB4C45A2705
gpg: packet(13) too large
gpg: read_block: read error: Invalid
ttrude.com on 4-Mar-2019 with a total of 5443075 keys.
My membership line:
sks.domainmail.net 11370 # Jim Popovitch
0x3F1C1EF2E6019EAC646CE45227155EB4C45A2705
Please contact me for any operational issues.
Thanks!!
- -Jim P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEECPbAhaBWEfiX
11 matches
Mail list logo