On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:03 AM, Gabor Kiss wrote:
>
>> I'm unable to find any updates beyond the original draft of
>> the OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver Protocol (HKP)[1]. Since the sks
>> keyservers are based on this protocol, are there any plans
>> on making progress in its adoption. It's been over 11 yea
On Jan 10, 2015, at 7:29 PM, Daniel Roesler wrote:
> I'm unable to find any updates beyond the original draft of
> the OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver Protocol (HKP)[1]. Since the sks
> keyservers are based on this protocol, are there any plans
> on making progress in its adoption. It's been over 11 years,
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
wrote:
>
> Is there anything requiring a formal spec for HKP for it to be taken
> into consideration? It is fairly well documented in the behavior of
> reference keyserver (SKS) and client implementation (GnuPG)
>
I'd recommend emailing Steph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/11/2015 01:29 AM, Daniel Roesler wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> I'm unable to find any updates beyond the original draft of the
> OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver Protocol (HKP)[1]. Since the sks keyservers
> are based on this protocol, are there any plans on
> I'm unable to find any updates beyond the original draft of
> the OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver Protocol (HKP)[1]. Since the sks
> keyservers are based on this protocol, are there any plans
> on making progress in its adoption. It's been over 11 years,
> so what can we do to get hkp finished?
I think a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy all,
I'm unable to find any updates beyond the original draft of
the OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver Protocol (HKP)[1]. Since the sks
keyservers are based on this protocol, are there any plans
on making progress in its adoption. It's been over 11 years,
