Arnold wrote:
> In-line PGP format is sensitive to all kind of conversions your mail client
> or intermediate mail system might do, like character set conversion or
> linefeed encoding (CR-LF, LF, CR), etc. It is better to use PGP/MIME which
> can handle this kind of conversions.
I think that may
On 08-01-10 02:36, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2010-01-07 at 14:54 -, crich...@fishysnax.com wrote:
>> I am looking for peers for a new SKS keyserver installation at
>> keyserver.fishysnax.com.
>
> Any idea why your PGP signature might have been marked BAD when my
> client tried to verify it?
In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > On 2010-01-07 at 14:54 -, crich...@fishysnax.com wrote:
> >> I am looking for peers for a new SKS keyserver installation at
> >> keyserver.fishysnax.com.
> >
> > Any idea why your PGP signature might have been marked BAD when my
> > client trie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2010-01-07 at 14:54 -, crich...@fishysnax.com wrote:
>> I am looking for peers for a new SKS keyserver installation at
>> keyserver.fishysnax.com.
>
> Any idea why your PGP signature might have been marked BAD when my
>
On 2010-01-07 at 14:54 -, crich...@fishysnax.com wrote:
> I am looking for peers for a new SKS keyserver installation at
> keyserver.fishysnax.com.
Any idea why your PGP signature might have been marked BAD when my
client tried to verify it?
-Phil
pgppdO0XnvZAt.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am looking for peers for a new SKS keyserver installation at
keyserver.fishysnax.com.
I am running SKS version 1.1.1, on keyserver.fishysnax.com.
This is a private VM located in Fremont, CA. The machine has IPv6
connectivity through SIXXS.