On 06/08/2017 09:46 AM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> Dear Kristian,
>
> Column 'IPv6' is fully red on page https://sks-keyservers.net/status/
> It seems your monitoring host lost its IPv6 connectivity.
>
Thanks for heads up, should be corrected again on next run
--
Dear Kristian,
Column 'IPv6' is fully red on page https://sks-keyservers.net/status/
It seems your monitoring host lost its IPv6 connectivity.
Gabor
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
On 07/17/2016 03:38 PM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> And
>
> $ host ipv6.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> Host ipv6.pool.sks-keyservers.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> $
Yup, seems my tunnel went down, should be back up during next update run
>
> Gabor
>
--
Kristian
And
$ host ipv6.pool.sks-keyservers.net
Host ipv6.pool.sks-keyservers.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
$
Gabor
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
Thanks, for the heads up. Seems to be ok again now (gave the tunnell a kick
behind..)
[Sent from my HTC, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic
keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP
signature. In general you should *not* rely on any information
Hi!
The IPv6 Address for keyserver.siccegge.de has changed (it's now
2001:a60:f01c:0:42::1). IPv4 addresses are still the same.
Regards
Christoph
pgpxTWd2Djxam.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
Thanks to everyone. :)
Now I've repaired the db environment (thanks to Jeff Johnson for scripts),
and also have learned some useful things about Berkeley DB.
Also I've upgraded my server (250MB + 1GB of RAM). So now it works well,
welcome: http://keyserver.fryxell.ru:11371
I have a new keyserver
One more problem with IPv6 peering:
2011-04-07 00:23:44 address for keyserver.siccegge.de:11370 changed from [] to
[ADDR_INET [2001:a60:f01c:0:70:1:6:42]:11370, ADDR_INET [212
.114.250.148]:11370, ADDR_INET [212.114.250.149]:11370]
Andrey Korobkov korob...@fryxell.ru writes:
One more problem with IPv6 peering:
2011-04-07 00:23:44 address for keyserver.siccegge.de:11370 changed
from [] to [ADDR_INET [2001:a60:f01c:0:70:1:6:42]:11370, ADDR_INET
[212
.114.250.148]:11370, ADDR_INET [212.114.250.149]:11370]
2011-04-07
That's good :)
So, that was because SKS was listening on IPv4.
But what about:
2011-04-07 00:57:02 Recon partner: ADDR_INET
[2001:a60:f01c:0:70:1:6:42]:11370
2011-04-07 00:57:03 Initiating reconciliation
Andrey Korobkov korob...@fryxell.ru writes:
That's good :)
So, that was because SKS was listening on IPv4.
But what about:
2011-04-07 00:57:02 Recon partner: ADDR_INET
[2001:a60:f01c:0:70:1:6:42]:11370
2011-04-07 00:57:03 Initiating reconciliation
2011-04-07 00:57:05 recon as client error
Андрей Коробков writes:
The only problem is to have such a huge key database being built from dump
on my memory-limited 32-bit home server. When I tried to do the thing on my
64-bit desktop
and then copy the DB files to server, SKS didn't want to start because of
something like
__db.003
Андрей Коробков korob...@fryxell.ru writes:
I'm using btrfs on server and reiserfs on desktop. May be, BDB do some
very-low level things?...
Is one of them 64 bit and the other 32 bit? If so that'll break. If the
server is 32bit you could build it on your desktop using a 32bit chroot
Андрей Коробков writes:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 08:23:59 +
Seems that db is totally broken:
On my desktop:
# db4.6_verify ptree
OK
On server:
[...]
# db4.6_verify ptree
db4.6_verify: __db.001: unable to find environment
# db4.6_recover -ve
Apparently while the DB itself is
Hello, all.
I want to set up keyserver, but it's only IPv6.
Would you accept it in the pool?
--
Andrey Korobkov korob...@fryxell.ru
PGP Key:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x177A2DB9EA08BF5Dfingerprint=on
pgpxQvEv1Jkux.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Once I get v6 to my keyserver (soon!), I'd be willing to peer unless
there's a reason I can't.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Андрей Коробков korob...@fryxell.ru wrote:
Hello, all.
I want to set up keyserver, but it's only IPv6.
Would you accept it in the pool?
--
Andrey Korobkov
Hi!
Андрей Коробков korob...@fryxell.ru writes:
I want to set up keyserver, but it's only IPv6.
Would you accept it in the pool?
I don't see any reason to reject such a keyserver and would peer with
you as soon as yours is up!
Regards
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655
Thanks a lot to all: you are very responsive people :)
I would be glad to peer with you all.
I already have set up domain, connectivity and keyserver.
offtop
The only problem is to have such a huge key database being built from dump
on my memory-limited 32-bit home server. When I tried to do the
Андрей Коробков korob...@fryxell.ru writes:
offtop
The only problem is to have such a huge key database being built from dump
on my memory-limited 32-bit home server. When I tried to do the thing on my
64-bit desktop
and then copy the DB files to server, SKS didn't want to start because of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Christoph Egger wrote:
ÐндÑей ÐоÑобков korob...@fryxell.ru writes:
offtop
The only problem is to have such a huge key database being built from dump
on my memory-limited 32-bit home server. When I tried to do the thing on
my
This patch is relative to Yaron's repository, with *his* version of the
IPv6 patch applied. hg log at end of mail, to make this clearer.
Sooner or later, I'll get around to learning enough of hg to be
comfortable leaving an instance running for others to connect to, but
not yet.
Full commit
On 2009-03-07 at 12:53 -0500, Yaron Minsky wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Phil Pennock
sks-devel-p...@spodhuis.orgwrote:
So, is there an easy way to detect from OCaml if there's a routable IPv6
service available, or should we provide knobs to disable IPv4 or IPv6?
In C, I'd use
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Phil Pennock sks-devel-p...@spodhuis.orgwrote:
On 2009-03-06 at 23:06 -0500, Yaron Minsky wrote:
- Cleaned up the way that IPv4 and IPv6 logic was chosen in the code
so
as to reduce boilerplate
let foo = bar in in the middle of a list. I have a lot
Phil Pennock:
* My larger patch, which opens separate sockets for each stack and
which adds recon6_address and hkp6_address options to sksconf if you
want to use a binding address other than :: (the IPv6 equivalent to
0.0.0.0).
I think this is the right approach except that instead
On 2009-03-06 at 23:06 -0500, Yaron Minsky wrote:
- Cleaned up the way that IPv4 and IPv6 logic was chosen in the code so
as to reduce boilerplate
let foo = bar in in the middle of a list. I have a lot to learn. ;)
- Got rid of incorrect use of ==. In OCaml, == is physical
Hi Phil,
Phil Pennock wrote:
2009-03-05 08:02:35 Reconciliation attempt from unauthorized host
ADDR_INET 2001:610:1108:5011:230:48ff:fe12:2794:58222. Ignoring
Reverse DNS says mud.stack.nl; I peer with keyserver.stack.nl which
does not have an record, therefore membership test
I'm really happy to see these changes being tried out. I'll read over the
diff today and try to get you some feedback.
y
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Phil Pennock sks-devel-p...@spodhuis.orgwrote:
On 2009-03-02 at 02:52 -0800, Phil Pennock wrote:
Can those with more experience in OCaml
On 2009-03-02 at 02:52 -0800, Phil Pennock wrote:
Can those with more experience in OCaml please take a look over this and
tell me if I'm heading down the right path?
This patch theoretically adds support for IPv6 in recon; it adds the
settings hooks for hkp too, but doesn't add anything
On 2009-03-04 at 23:24 -0800, Phil Pennock wrote:
If you try my patch out, I'd appreciate feedback. If you're peering
with sks-peer.spodhuis.org then you might want to keep an eye on
recon.log and see if you get an IPv6 peering. :) But please, keep a
safe copy of your normal binary to fall
Ok.. I've worked a bit on sks-keyservers.net lately and added some IPv6
checking.
Anyone care to test the ipv6.pool.sks-keyservers.net pool? I also added
IPv6 flag at http://www.sks-keyservers.net/status/
Hopefully it works a bit better now than last time :)
Folks,
Until SKS has no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ryan Hunt wrote, On 10/17/2008 07:50 AM:
First, thanks to everyone who peered w/me, had no idea I'd get as many
responses and so quickly. Neat community here.
Anyhow, I dug through all the SKS servers I could find and found a total
of 5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unfortunately there are alot of servers that have records but are
not listening on IPv6... I went through the hosts currently in your
pool and all the following were not IPv6 capable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet
Ryan Hunt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet 2001:610:1108:5011:230:48ff:fe12:2794 11371
Trying 2001:610:1108:5011:230:48ff:fe12:2794...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
This is an address of my server (keyserver.stack.nl). However the IPv6
address isn't advertised
33 matches
Mail list logo
