[Sks-devel] Reverse-Proxy Test Request

2013-05-15 Thread John Marshall
Greetings All, keys.riverwillow.net.au has just had some long-overdue TLC. I have upgraded from 1.1.3 to 1.1.4 (with a complete dump and reload) and have moved the db server behind a Squid server on the same host. It looks to me like everything is working as it should but, given some of the reve

Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy

2012-04-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 04/28/2012 09:39 PM, John Clizbe wrote: > 1.1.1? If doing an update, why not go to 1.1.3, rather than add a patch or two > to 1.1.1? > > 1.1.1 also has the broken HTML generation in it which was fixed for 1.1.2. I understand there are several changes worth importing, and i agree that the right

Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy

2012-04-28 Thread John Clizbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1,SHA256 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 04/28/2012 09:26 AM, Jens Leinenbach wrote: >> As already discussed on this list, there is this old SKS bug using POST >> requests without sending the http version, so ngnix denies these POST >> request. >> And I

Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy

2012-04-28 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 29.04.2012 00:58, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 04/28/2012 09:26 AM, Jens Leinenbach wrote: > > > I do not recommend exposing SKS directly on port 11372, since that > would mean leaving yourself exposed directly to the same DoS attack > that t

Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy

2012-04-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 04/28/2012 09:26 AM, Jens Leinenbach wrote: > As already discussed on this list, there is this old SKS bug using POST > requests without sending the http version, so ngnix denies these POST > request. > And I didn't find any workaround, so that ngnix can fix these requests. It looks like you're

Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy

2012-04-28 Thread Jens Leinenbach
Hi Kristian, > The workaround is to make SKS listen to e.g. port 11372, as specified > in hkp_port in sksconf, that is allowed access only by your peer list. That's an interesting idea as a workaround as ngnix would not protect sks... I'll think about that. > As for the use of nginx, are you sure

Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy

2012-04-28 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 28.04.2012 15:45, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 28.04.2012 15:26, Jens Leinenbach wrote: ... > The workaround is to make SKS listen to e.g. port 11372, as > specified in hkp_port in sksconf, that is allowed access only by > your peer list. U

Re: [Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy

2012-04-28 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 28.04.2012 15:26, Jens Leinenbach wrote: > Hi Kristian, > > I installed a reverse proxy over a week ago, but it seems not to > be recognized, as you can see here: > http://keyserver.ccc-hanau.de:11371/ngnix > http://sks-keyservers.net/status/in

[Sks-devel] Reverse Proxy

2012-04-28 Thread Jens Leinenbach
Hi Kristian, I installed a reverse proxy over a week ago, but it seems not to be recognized, as you can see here: http://keyserver.ccc-hanau.de:11371/ngnix http://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/keyserver.ccc-hanau.de To configure that, I left the SKS configuration untouched (after some known probl