On Jan 25, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Christoph Egger
wrote:
> John Clizbe writes:
>> Christoph Egger wrote:
>>> Something weird happening when fetching 0xE33EC63DF983 -- it gets
>>> 0x9CDF568F which doesn't even have a subkey called 0xE33EC63DF983 as
>>> far as I can see. Anyone knows what's g
John Clizbe writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Something weird happening when fetching 0xE33EC63DF983 -- it gets
>> 0x9CDF568F which doesn't even have a subkey called 0xE33EC63DF983 as
>> far as I can see. Anyone knows what's going on?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Christoph
>>
> It's a su
Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Something weird happening when fetching 0xE33EC63DF983 -- it gets
> 0x9CDF568F which doesn't even have a subkey called 0xE33EC63DF983 as
> far as I can see. Anyone knows what's going on?
>
> Regards
>
> Christoph
>
It's a subkey according to a verb
Hi!
Something weird happening when fetching 0xE33EC63DF983 -- it gets
0x9CDF568F which doesn't even have a subkey called 0xE33EC63DF983 as
far as I can see. Anyone knows what's going on?
Regards
Christoph
christoph@mitoraj {3} ~
11:07 0 % gpg --recv-keys 0xE33EC63DF983
gpg: r