On Mar 10, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 09:52 -0400, David Shaw wrote:
We may end up with "hkps" on port 11372 just for lack of support for
doing anything else.
One should not use port numbers from the registered port numbers
area,... if it's not actu
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 09:52 -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> We may end up with "hkps" on port 11372 just for lack of support for
> doing anything else.
One should not use port numbers from the registered port numbers
area,... if it's not actually registered or even used by something else.
Chris.
sm
On Mar 8, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 03/07/2009 09:37 PM, David Shaw wrote:
On Mar 7, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
We also are listening on port 11372 because this seems to be the
choice
of gnupg maintainers for hkp-over-tls (hkps?), according to this
r
On 03/07/2009 09:37 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> We also are listening on port 11372 because this seems to be the choice
>> of gnupg maintainers for hkp-over-tls (hkps?), according to this recent
>> (as yet unreleased) patch to gpg:
>>
>> http
On Mar 8, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 03/07/2009 03:03 PM, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
On Mar 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Gab wrote:
I wish to in https ssl the sks web interface .
What are the directives for cert.pem and key.pem and t
> > I wonder what is the advantage of SSL in case of key servers?
> Have a look at this:
> http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/msg30930.html
Uh... it's interesting idea. :-)
Gabor
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lis
Hi.
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 08:13 +0100, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> I wonder what is the advantage of SSL in case of key servers?
Have a look at this:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/msg30930.html
Best wishes,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 03/07/2009 03:03 PM, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Gab wrote:
> >> I wish to in https ssl the sks web interface .
> >> What are the directives for cert.pem and key.pem and to enable ssl ?
> >
> > I don't believe that
On Mar 7, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
We also are listening on port 11372 because this seems to be the
choice
of gnupg maintainers for hkp-over-tls (hkps?), according to this
recent
(as yet unreleased) patch to gpg:
http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/STABLE-B
On 03/07/2009 03:03 PM, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Gab wrote:
>> I wish to in https ssl the sks web interface .
>> What are the directives for cert.pem and key.pem and to enable ssl ?
>
> I don't believe that the built-in web server supports SSL. However, you
> could
On Mar 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Gab wrote:
Hi!
I wish to in https ssl the sks web interface .
What are the directives for cert.pem and key.pem and to enable ssl ?
Thanks!
I don't believe that the built-in web server supports SSL. However,
you could front-end SKS with Apache configured as a pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi!
I wish to in https ssl the sks web interface .
What are the directives for cert.pem and key.pem and to enable ssl ?
Thanks!
Ask to for GOSSIP with pgp.gabrix.ath.cx 11370.
Gab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Com
12 matches
Mail list logo
