Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

Hi, I am looking for peers for a new Hockeypuck installation. I am running Hockeypuck 2.1.2, on keys.dryusdan.net. I am Dryusdan, a tech and privacy lover. In the past, I was part of the collective CHATONS (https://www.chatons.org/en), launch by Framasoft (for french here who know who there ar

Re: Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

Hi (again), Finally, gpg.4n0ny.me is finaly operational earlier than expected. So I looking for peers for gpg.4n0ny.me too. Same description as keys.dryusdan.fr, I get keydyump from Cyberbits (|rsync.cyberbits.eu/sks/dump/)|, dated 2024-03-25. I see 6587450 keys loaded. But I have IPv6 con

Re: Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 04:37:03PM +0200, Dryusdan wrote: > Hi (again), > > > Finally, gpg.4n0ny.me is finaly operational earlier than expected. > > So I looking for peers for gpg.4n0ny.me too. > > Same description as keys.dryusdan.fr, I get keydyump from Cyberbits > (|rsync.cyberbits.eu/sks/du

Re: Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

On 31 Mar 2024, at 21:25, William Hay wrote: >> > Do you have protections against flooding attacks in place on your > keyservers(appropriately > configured rate limiting proxy)? Hi, guys. According to the spider at https://spider.pgpkeys.eu/sks-peers, keys.dryusdan.net and gpg.4n0ny.me appear

Re: Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

Hi 👋 I change my setup today and add HAProxy and standalone configuration. Actually it is behind nginx for both, keys.dryusdan.net and gpg.4n0ny.me. I check and found no problem (and logs don't report me any problem). In the futur I will drop nginx (but I need to learn and make an ansible pl

Re: Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

On 5 Apr 2024, at 17:34, Dryusdan wrote: > > I change my setup today and add HAProxy and standalone configuration. > Actually it is behind nginx for both, keys.dryusdan.net > and gpg.4n0ny.me . Great stuff! Did you make sure to uncomment HAP_BE

Re: Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

I double check and no, HAP_BEHIND_PROXY wasn't set. But HAP_BEHIND_PROXY_EXCEPT_HKP is (in /etc/default/haproxy I directly set variable and it loaded by systemd service) Is now ok :) Dryusdan Le 05/04/2024 à 18:40, Andrew Gallagher a écrit : On 5 Apr 2024, at 17:34, Dryusdan wrote: I cha

Re: Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

On 5 Apr 2024, at 18:36, Dryusdan wrote: > > I double check and no, HAP_BEHIND_PROXY wasn't set. But > HAP_BEHIND_PROXY_EXCEPT_HKP is (in /etc/default/haproxy I directly set > variable and it loaded by systemd service) > > Is now ok :) > So that would imply that ports 80 and 443 are behind n

Re: Seeking peers for keys.dryusdan.net

Yes, I had both value enable. I just remove HAP_BEHIND_PROXY_EXCEPT_HKP now and keep HAP_BEHIND_PROXY :) (I think now is okay ^^) Thank Dryusdan Le 06/04/2024 à 21:30, Andrew Gallagher a écrit : On 6 Apr 2024, at 18:29, Dryusdan wrote: No, these three port are behind nginx Okay, I see the