On 2/26/09, JK Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Robby Workman
> wrote:
> > Besides, something like this would take all the fun out of comparing
> > build times -- there would be this boring "<1SBU" or "10SBU" or
> > "400SBU" instead of "faster than a fifteen year old boy's first ti
Hi, all,
It's not a bug of slackbuilds but slackbuilds.org. When I submitting a
package, I noticed the submission page rendered weird in firefox. Here is
the screen shot:
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/q8NlYX9sQWJSsD8c5eg1OQ?feat=directlink
--
Cheers,
Grissiom
___
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Robby Workman wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:52:58 -0600
> Vincent Batts wrote:
>
> > In the same fashion of the Linux-From-Scratch guide, what are
> > everyone's idea on having a baseline package build time marked as the
> > Single Build Unit (SBU). some packag
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:52:58 -0600
Vincent Batts wrote:
> In the same fashion of the Linux-From-Scratch guide, what are
> everyone's idea on having a baseline package build time marked as the
> Single Build Unit (SBU). some package of consensus, and included in
> the README's could have in SBU's
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:21:06 +0100
Thomas Morper wrote:
> Just in case this hasn't been addressed yet and is already in the
> queue waiting for a push...
>
> Adobe has fixed a vulnerability in the Flash Player:
>
> http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-01.html
>
> The downlo
In the same fashion of the Linux-From-Scratch guide, what are everyone's
idea on having a baseline package build time marked as the Single Build Unit
(SBU). some package of consensus, and included in the README's could have in
SBU's the relative build time of their SlackBuild. for example if libsnd
thank you, Thomas
--- On Thu, 2/26/09, Thomas Morper wrote:
> From: Thomas Morper
> Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Flash Player security update
> To: slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
> Date: Thursday, February 26, 2009, 2:21 PM
> Just in case this hasn't been addressed yet and is
> already in t
Just in case this hasn't been addressed yet and is already in the queue
waiting for a push...
Adobe has fixed a vulnerability in the Flash Player:
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-01.html
The download-link from the .info-File now points to version 10.0r22,
md5sum is 23e4
2009/2/26 Robby Workman :
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:21:40 -0500
> Chess Griffin wrote:
>
>> * Include a French translation of the two sbopkg man pages. For
>> now, these man pages will be included in the /doc directory until I
>> have time to figure out whether they can be automatically installe
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:21:40 -0500
Chess Griffin wrote:
> * Include a French translation of the two sbopkg man pages. For
> now, these man pages will be included in the /doc directory until I
> have time to figure out whether they can be automatically installed
> in place of the English ones d
A new version 0.27.0 of sbopkg has been released. Once again, I have
had great assistance from several contributors in the form of feature
requests, bug reports, and patches. I would like to especially thank
Mauro Giachero and slakmagik for their hard work in reviewing code,
providing patches, an
11 matches
Mail list logo
