On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2010 15:30:10 Andrew Antle wrote:
>> A few minor typo fixes. Diff attached:
>
> Fixed in my branch, thanks!
> Should be part of the next push of updates.
>
> Grs,
> Heinz
Thanks, Heinz!
--
Andrew Antle
___
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2010 15:30:10 Andrew Antle wrote:
>> A few minor typo fixes. Diff attached:
>
> Fixed in my branch, thanks!
> Should be part of the next push of updates.
>
> Grs,
> Heinz
Thanks, Heinz!
--
Andrew Antle
___
Nice. Thank you
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2010 16:26:38 luciano wrote:
>> Task doesn't build. The link seems wrong. It gives 404 message.
>
> Thanks for the report!
> I fixed this in my branch, it should be part of the next push of updates.
>
On Thursday 04 November 2010 15:30:10 Andrew Antle wrote:
> A few minor typo fixes. Diff attached:
>
> --- README.orig 2010-11-04 10:20:04.412448942 -0400
> +++ README2010-11-04 10:20:30.663595260 -0400
> @@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
> -The gprolog configure script appears to ignore the execc-prefix
On Thursday 04 November 2010 16:26:38 luciano wrote:
> Task doesn't build. The link seems wrong. It gives 404 message.
Thanks for the report!
I fixed this in my branch, it should be part of the next push of updates.
Grs,
Heinz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I think slackbuilds should read #!/bin/bash (and not sh or ash) for
maximum safety and compatility.
It's a 2 minute job for everyone the alter the script to build with ash
(if it would build with ash or any other)
but it can't be the job of every maintainer to test building against all
the dif
