Re: [Slackbuilds-users] OPTIONAL field [was: qemu/spice-gtk and usbredir]

On 25/10/16 08:46, Andrzej Telszewski wrote: Most probably what the supporters of OPTIONAL think of, is that this field would contain all the possible software that might be added to broaden the capabilities of the package, but is not absolutely necessary to compile/run the package. Basically,

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] OPTIONAL field [was: qemu/spice-gtk and usbredir]

On 24/10/16 23:57, Christoph Willing wrote: On 25/10/16 01:37, Franzen wrote: On 23.10.2016 12:36, Andrzej Telszewski wrote: On 23/10/16 01:56, Christoph Willing wrote: Who is going to decide REQUIRED vs OPTIONAL for the many (I suspect) non obvious cases? Presumably the maintainer. If a

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] OPTIONAL field [was: qemu/spice-gtk and usbredir]

On 25/10/16 01:37, Franzen wrote: On 23.10.2016 12:36, Andrzej Telszewski wrote: On 23/10/16 01:56, Christoph Willing wrote: Who is going to decide REQUIRED vs OPTIONAL for the many (I suspect) non obvious cases? Presumably the maintainer. If a maintainer's balance of REQUIRED/OPTIONAL deps

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] fzf fails to build

2016-10-24 22:10 GMT+02:00 Jostein Berntsen : > Building fzf after processing the package with sqg gives this error: > > # _/tmp/SBo/fzf-0.13.5/src/fzf > /tmp/go-build733267827/_/tmp/SBo/fzf-0.13.5/src/fzf/_obj/_go_.o: In function >

[Slackbuilds-users] fzf fails to build

Building fzf after processing the package with sqg gives this error: # _/tmp/SBo/fzf-0.13.5/src/fzf /tmp/go-build733267827/_/tmp/SBo/fzf-0.13.5/src/fzf/_obj/_go_.o: In function `main.AN36_github_com_junegunn_fzf_src$sizeSpec4e$hash': /tmp/SBo/fzf-0.13.5/src/fzf/main.go:5: undefined reference to

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] cholmod build failure

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:55:48 +0200 Matteo Bernardini wrote: > BTW, try changing umfpack's autotoolize.diff like below Seems to fix the problem, thanks. WBR, Daniil Bratashov. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qemu/spice-gtk and usbredir

On 23.10.2016 12:36, Andrzej Telszewski wrote: On 23/10/16 01:56, Christoph Willing wrote: Who is going to decide REQUIRED vs OPTIONAL for the many (I suspect) non obvious cases? Presumably the maintainer. If a maintainer's balance of REQUIRED/OPTIONAL deps doesn't suit someone else's

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] cholmod build failure

2016-10-24 14:46 GMT+02:00 Daniil Bratashov : > Seems to be still underlinked, it now breaks the build of umfpack with ld > error. I'm not sure is cholmod's fault (I've tried also adding -lgfortran to its pkconfig file). BTW, try changing umfpack's autotoolize.diff like below

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] cholmod build failure

Seems to be still underlinked, it now breaks the build of umfpack with ld error. WBR, Daniil Bratashov. On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Daniil Bratashov wrote: > On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:50:14 +0200 > Matteo Bernardini wrote: > >> I think it's a

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] slackbuilds.org submission removal doesn't work

Willy Sudiarto Raharjo @ 2016-10-24T11:43:45 +0200: > > I've removed perl-Test-PerlTidy from the pending list, but the submit > > interface says that it's there and cannot upload it. > > It's because it's a dep for ClusterSSH > i have removed ClusterSSH as well and now you can resubmit both

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] slackbuilds.org submission removal doesn't work

> I've removed perl-Test-PerlTidy from the pending list, but the submit > interface says that it's there and cannot upload it. It's because it's a dep for ClusterSSH i have removed ClusterSSH as well and now you can resubmit both packages -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo signature.asc Description:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-24 9:43 GMT+02:00 Christoph Willing : > I can take openshot. thanks Chris, I'm sure it will be in good hands! > However goocanvas and pygoocanvas are not used in the new version (which > needs several other new SlackBuilds instead) so someone else should take

[Slackbuilds-users] slackbuilds.org submission removal doesn't work

Hi! I've removed perl-Test-PerlTidy from the pending list, but the submit interface says that it's there and cannot upload it. Daniel ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

On 23/10/16 16:44, Matteo Bernardini wrote: 2016-10-22 10:07 GMT+02:00 : Good morning everyone Is it likely that we will see a move towards the latest release of Openshot please? I am asking because I wondered, not withstanding and respecting maintainers'