On 3/6/17, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
> Since pulseaudio is now supported in Slackware and OSS is deprecated,
> it's wise to provide out-of-the-box functionality for the package.
>
> Please make a note in the comment section so that it will be included in
> the git
> One of the package scripts I have been granted permission to take over
> is ham/qrq, a Morse Code speed trainer. The version of the script
> currently in the repository builds with support of OSS sound.
> Unfortunately, on my Slackware 14.2 and Slackware64 14.2 VMs, qrq fails
> at runtime with
* On 2017 06 Mar 21:37 -0600, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
> we (admins) do that automatically by using git hooks i sent earlier.
> That will automatically add SoB line everytime we merged other
> maintainer's work during public update.
>
> Maintainers can also use the git hooks for their
> After browsing the recent commits, I noticed that each contains a
> "Signed-off-by: " line. In some cases it is signed by commit the author
> and in other cases I see that you (Willy) have signed it.
>
> I presume that this pattern indicates that a maintainer making a commit
> in their branch
One of the package scripts I have been granted permission to take over
is ham/qrq, a Morse Code speed trainer. The version of the script
currently in the repository builds with support of OSS sound.
Unfortunately, on my Slackware 14.2 and Slackware64 14.2 VMs, qrq fails
at runtime with a message
Hi Willy.
After browsing the recent commits, I noticed that each contains a
"Signed-off-by: " line. In some cases it is signed by commit the author
and in other cases I see that you (Willy) have signed it.
I presume that this pattern indicates that a maintainer making a commit
in their branch
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 05:22:23 +0300, Dimitris Zlatanidis wrote:
> On 08/25/2016 10:59 PM, Audrius Kažukauskas wrote:
> > Could admins please remove the following obsolete build scripts?
> >
> > network/node (replaced by development/nodejs)
> > python/pep8 (replaced by python/pycodestyle)
>
>
I just wanted to add my input, for whatever it is worth, that one of the
chief things I find attractive about SBo is the"maintainer model". That
is not to say Sbo's utilization of this model cannot be improved;
because, I think it can be. Overall I think, things should remain much
the same as they