Hi all
i've pushed 2 new -review branch. One for wxGTK3 and one for poedit.
Both are required to test the new poedit 2.0 which doesn't work with
wxGTK 3.0.2. I switched to the latest wxGTK3 3.0 branch which include a
fix and upgrade poedit to 2.0 + 1 commit from upstream since 2.0.1
hasn't been
On 4/4/17, Christoph Willing wrote:
>
> My list is:
> graphviz libbluray octave Coin VTK commons-daemon ProjectLibre kodi
> cudatoolkit apache-tomcat OpenCASCADE portmidi belle-sip LibreOffice
> freewrl gdal opencv mlt
If you (or anyone else reading this thread) feel
On 05/04/17 11:34, B Watson wrote:
> On 4/4/17, Christoph Willing wrote:
>
>> I recently went through all the SlackBuilds I use which require jdk and
>> rebuilt/tested/use them with openjdk instead. I don't recall what my
>> initial motivation was (I'm an open*
On 4/4/17, Christoph Willing wrote:
> I recently went through all the SlackBuilds I use which require jdk and
> rebuilt/tested/use them with openjdk instead. I don't recall what my
> initial motivation was (I'm an open* sympathizer, not zealot) but I
> found they all
On 05/04/17 05:36, B Watson wrote:
> On 4/4/17, Gerardo Zamudio wrote:
>
>>
>> I meant a general justification and answer for common JDK SlackBuild
>> related questions we've seen in this and other threads.
>>
>> FAQ #23 and HOWTO only state you need a full Slackware
Willy,
Thanks for touching up that slimjet SlackBuild.
It was getting late, and I thought about what you fixed only after I started my
day this morning.
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
On 4/4/17, Gerardo Zamudio wrote:
>
> I meant a general justification and answer for common JDK SlackBuild
> related questions we've seen in this and other threads.
>
> FAQ #23 and HOWTO only state you need a full Slackware installation and
> custom builds are not
On 04/04/2017 01:29 PM, Matteo Bernardini wrote:
> 2017-04-04 20:20 GMT+02:00 Gerardo Zamudio :
>> Let's add this to the FAQ.
>
> mmm, isn't it already covered by FAQ #23 and at the beginning of the HOWTO?
>
> Matteo
>
I meant a general justification and answer
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:29:07 -0700 Matteo Bernardini
matteo.bernard...@gmail.com wrote
2017-04-04 20:20 GMT+02:00 Gerardo Zamudio gerardo.zamu...@linux.com:
Let's add this to the FAQ.
mmm, isn't it already covered by FAQ #23 and at the beginning of the HOWTO?
It
2017-04-04 20:20 GMT+02:00 Gerardo Zamudio :
> Let's add this to the FAQ.
mmm, isn't it already covered by FAQ #23 and at the beginning of the HOWTO?
Matteo
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
On 04/04/2017 01:18 PM, Matteo Bernardini wrote:
> 2017-04-04 20:02 GMT+02:00 Eric Pratt :
>> But, if we can't automate this, then I have to admit I don't understand why
>> the jdk slackbuild even exists on slackbuilds.org. java.Slackbuild is
>> provided in the
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:16:20 -0700 B Watson yalh...@gmail.com
wrote
On 4/4/17, Andreas Guldstrand andreas.guldstr...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would automation be needed to have a SlackBuild on SBo? The
benefit of the SlackBuild is the same benefit as every other
2017-04-04 20:02 GMT+02:00 Eric Pratt :
> But, if we can't automate this, then I have to admit I don't understand why
> the jdk slackbuild even exists on slackbuilds.org. java.Slackbuild is
> provided in the distribution which will create a JDK or JRE package as
> desired.
On 4/4/17, Andreas Guldstrand wrote:
> Why would automation be needed to have a SlackBuild on SBo? The
> benefit of the SlackBuild is the same benefit as every other
> SlackBuild on SBo.
I think the question was more "Why does SBo need a jdk build, when
Slackware
On 4 April 2017 at 20:02, Eric Pratt wrote:
> But, if we can't automate this, then I have to admit I don't understand why
> the jdk slackbuild even exists on slackbuilds.org. java.Slackbuild is
> provided in the distribution which will create a JDK or JRE package as
>
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Matteo Bernardini <
matteo.bernard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-04-04 19:17 GMT+02:00 Eric Pratt :
> > I found this by using HttpFox on Firefox to see what was happening when
> I
> > clicked through the website and downloaded via a browser.
Le 4 avril 2017 19:37:50 GMT+02:00, B Watson a écrit :
>On 4/4/17, Arnaud wrote:
>
>> Since jdk is (as far as I know) the only one with that kind of wget
>option
>> needed, I feel it would be the job of the third party tool to handle
>it
>> specifically.
On 4/4/17, Arnaud wrote:
> Since jdk is (as far as I know) the only one with that kind of wget option
> needed, I feel it would be the job of the third party tool to handle it
> specifically. Instead of adding a field into the .info file...
There are at least 2 or 3 other
Le 4 avril 2017 19:17:13 GMT+02:00, Eric Pratt a écrit
:
>
>
>On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Evandro Alves
>wrote:
>
>> Fellype,
>>
>> It has always been like this. The oracle website does not allow a
>direct
>> download through wget, to force
2017-04-04 19:17 GMT+02:00 Eric Pratt :
> I found this by using HttpFox on Firefox to see what was happening when I
> clicked through the website and downloaded via a browser. It's important to
> understand that you are still accepting the license agreement by using wget
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Evandro Alves
wrote:
> Fellype,
>
> It has always been like this. The oracle website does not allow a direct
> download through wget, to force people to accept their licence agreement.
>
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Edward
On 04/04/2017 01:07 PM, Matteo Bernardini wrote:
Hi Fellype,
it's written in the README
https://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.2/development/jdk/
remember it's assumed that you have read the READMEs of the things you
build from SBo, also if you use some third party automated tool with
the
2017-04-04 16:26 GMT+02:00 Fellype do Nascimento :
> Hi all,
> I was trying to install jdk by using sboinstall, but the download fails. In
> order to be able to download the file jdk-8u121-linux-i586.tar.gz I had to
> access the Oracle's website [1] and click on the "Accept
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Fellype do Nascimento wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I was trying to install jdk by using sboinstall, but the download fails. In
> order to be able to download the file jdk-8u121-linux-i586.tar.gz I had to
> access the Oracle's website [1] and click on
Fellype,
It has always been like this. The oracle website does not allow a direct
download through wget, to force people to accept their licence agreement.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Fellype do Nascimento
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was trying to install jdk by using
Hi all,
I was trying to install jdk by using sboinstall, but the download fails.
In order to be able to download the file jdk-8u121-linux-i586.tar.gz I
had to access the Oracle's website [1] and click on the "Accept License
Agreement" check box.
Best regards,
Fellype
[1]
26 matches
Mail list logo