> I attempted to upgrade my xonotic package, but I came across this failure:
>
> cc -MMD -DDP_FS_BASEDIR=\"/usr/share/xonotic\" -Wall
> -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wsign-compare
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wmissing-prototypes -DLINK_TO_ZLIB
> -DLINK_TO_LIBJPEG-D_FILE_OFF
Симонъ,
I attempted to upgrade my xonotic package, but I came across this failure:
cc -MMD -DDP_FS_BASEDIR=\"/usr/share/xonotic\" -Wall
-Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wsign-compare
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wmissing-prototypes -DLINK_TO_ZLIB
-DLINK_TO_LIBJPEG-D_FILE_OFF
SET
>>> libraries/lua-mpack: Updated for version 1.0.6.
>>
>> The actual MD5SUM I get (8870b151c71234435b5d21f1f825aa17) differs from
>> the one in .info file.
>
> I was too quick to post this, because it doesn't build as well, there
> are some source files missing.
>
> It seems that the correct down
* On 2017 07 Apr 20:25 -0500, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
> Nevermind, i just merged your PR
Thanks, Willy.
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us
signatu
On Sat, 2017-04-08 at 13:24:59 +0300, Audrius Kažukauskas wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-04-08 at 07:35:53 +0700, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
> > libraries/lua-mpack: Updated for version 1.0.6.
>
> The actual MD5SUM I get (8870b151c71234435b5d21f1f825aa17) differs from
> the one in .info file.
I was too
On Sat, 2017-04-08 at 07:35:53 +0700, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
> libraries/lua-mpack: Updated for version 1.0.6.
The actual MD5SUM I get (8870b151c71234435b5d21f1f825aa17) differs from
the one in .info file.
--
Audrius Kažukauskas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
