[Slackbuilds-users] What happened to libssh2?

xen lists libssh2 as an optional dependency, but I can't find it at SBo. It was there on Nov 10 2016, that's when I last built it. Did I miss an announcement? Cheers ... Duncan. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] What happened to libssh2?

> xen lists libssh2 as an optional dependency, but I can't find it at SBo. > > It was there on Nov 10 2016, that's when I last built it. > > Did I miss an announcement? https://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/commit/?id=12dde3a325d5441a27dcd7ec48349d07af1073b0 -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo

[Slackbuilds-users] What happened to libssh2?

xen lists libssh2 as an optional dependency, but I can't find it at SBo. It was there on Nov 10 2016, that's when I last built it. Did I miss an announcement? Cheers ... Duncan. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170603.1

> Maybe it would make sense to have the git hook to extract the version from > *.info? > > Then the whole "Updated for version X.X.X." message could be determined and > generated automatically? my own review script already generates the message and author this way. But it generates the same

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170603.1

On 03/06/17 19:58, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: system/krusader: Updated for version 3.0.1. Some error must have occurred ;-) There's no krusader 3.0.1 yet ;-) Yep, my bad it was supposed to be system/image-analyzer Maybe it would make sense to have the git hook to extract the version from

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] question about libjvm.so symlinks

Hello, I know why this symlink is in place. However, there's no documentation which specifies this symlink is a *requirement*. There's no serious softwares which requires it, and there's no other linux distribution which has a jdk with that symlink. Therefore, there's no reason to have this

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Qt 5.9 LTS released

On 06/04/2017 06:06 PM, Harald Achitz wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, even if it makes me sad to hear that, in > case of Qt, stability and predictability is not the primary concern of > SBo. I actually drew the opposite conclusion from Willy's post. For what it's worth, I have not noticed

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Qt 5.9 LTS released

> what do you want to tell me? > Ok, I was wrong, there was for some weeks a stable version of Qt on SBo, > did not notice it because at this time I had already to use my own builds, > why? > the update to 5.6 was a half year late, and than instead of staying on the > stable LTS version the jump

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Qt 5.9 LTS released

what do you want to tell me? Ok, I was wrong, there was for some weeks a stable version of Qt on SBo, did not notice it because at this time I had already to use my own builds, why? the update to 5.6 was a half year late, and than instead of staying on the stable LTS version the jump to the next

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Qt 5.9 LTS released

thanks, so there was for 3 month, until the ignored update to 5.6.2, a not outdated stable version available. If you think that does make Qt from SBo more usable, I have to disagree. 2017-06-04 8:26 GMT+02:00 Matteo Bernardini : > 2017-06-04 8:13 GMT+02:00 Harald

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Qt 5.9 LTS released

Le 04/06/2017 à 08:26, Matteo Bernardini a écrit : > 2017-06-04 8:13 GMT+02:00 Harald Achitz : >> thanks Larry that you self delivered the reason why the SBo version should >> have been, and should be, on the LTS Version 5.6x and not on some >> intermediate development

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] question about libjvm.so symlinks

for that other programs can find libjvm.so in the library search path ./$PRGNAM/jre/lib/${LIB_ARCH}/server/ is just some path only the program self knows $PKG/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX} is a path all other programs also know /Harald 2017-06-02 18:41 GMT+02:00 Sebastien BALLET

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Qt 5.9 LTS released

thanks Larry that you self delivered the reason why the SBo version should have been, and should be, on the LTS Version 5.6x and not on some intermediate development release. The 5.6 never mad it into SBo, right? you missed it, too long on the outdated 5.5 than jump to 5.7 . Excellent expert