On 09/01/2017 08:52 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Robby Workman wrote:
>
>> I'd almost bet dollars to donuts that gnucash is trying to link to a
>> library that is linked to that libsomething.so.56, but since the
>> libsomething.so.56 is not present any more, the link is failing.
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Robby Workman wrote:
I'd almost bet dollars to donuts that gnucash is trying to link to a
library that is linked to that libsomething.so.56, but since the
libsomething.so.56 is not present any more, the link is failing.
Robby,
It's the opposite. Gnucash wants
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Erik Hanson wrote:
>
> > So, yet again Rich, the issue is not reproducible and appears to be
> > on your end.
>
>Which is why I'm trying to learn where the conflict is so that it
>
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Erik Hanson wrote:
So, yet again Rich, the issue is not reproducible and appears to be on
your end.
Which is why I'm trying to learn where the conflict is so that it can be
removed.
Rich
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
On 09/01/2017 12:52 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I think the problem with not building gnucash-2.6.17 on my 32-bit 14.2
> system is related to outdated SBo libraries, specifically libwebp and
> webkitgtk.
>
> libwebp is now at version 0.6.0; it built and upgraded on my desktop.
>
> webkitgtk
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, 4:35 PM Dario Niedermann
wrote:
> Hello. May I enquire why the SlackBuild for pure-ftpd-1.0.46 (for
> Slackware 14.2) configures the build without inetd (by including
> the '--without-inetd' configure option) ?
>
> TIA,
> DN
>
>
> --
> Dario
i have no idea but there are two ftp packages included in slackware.
proftpd
vsftpd
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Dario Niedermann
wrote:
> Hello. May I enquire why the SlackBuild for pure-ftpd-1.0.46 (for
> Slackware 14.2) configures the build without inetd (by
Le 01/09/2017 à 20:59, Rich Shepard a écrit :
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Didier Spaier wrote:
>
>> And that maybe one of the reason why @ SBo gnucsh is still @ 2.6.17...
>
> Didier,
>
> When I look at SBo I see gnucash-2.6.13 ...
Yes. I failed to re-read before posting, sorry
>> It is on SBo
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Didier Spaier wrote:
And that maybe one of the reason why @ SBo gnucsh is still @ 2.6.17...
Didier,
When I look at SBo I see gnucash-2.6.13 ...
It is on SBo but under a different name:
http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.2/libraries/webkit2gtk/
... and following
not a python-dateutil, it is now build without python3 support.
WBR, Daniil Bratashov.
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives -
Le 01/09/2017 à 20:20, Rich Shepard a écrit :
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Didier Spaier wrote:
>
>> If you don't build the packages at the versions for which the SlackBuilds
>> have been tested you are on your own, Rich.
>
> Didier,
>
> The 2.4.11 version is well out of date and does not provide a
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Didier Spaier wrote:
If you don't build the packages at the versions for which the SlackBuilds
have been tested you are on your own, Rich.
Didier,
The 2.4.11 version is well out of date and does not provide a current
library version so gnucash-2.6.17 won't build on
Hello,
Le 01/09/2017 à 19:52, Rich Shepard a écrit :
> I think the problem with not building gnucash-2.6.17 on my 32-bit 14.2
> system is related to outdated SBo libraries, specifically libwebp and
> webkitgtk.
>
> libwebp is now at version 0.6.0; it built and upgraded on my desktop.
>
>
Hello,
the package *slackware-xdg-menu *does not create the required directory
/var/cache/xdg-menu which prevents tool update-menus to work properly (*fails
without any message*). The attached patch fixes this issue.
--
SeB
--- slackware-xdg-menu.SlackBuild.orig 2017-09-01 19:57:12.332286850
I think the problem with not building gnucash-2.6.17 on my 32-bit 14.2
system is related to outdated SBo libraries, specifically libwebp and
webkitgtk.
libwebp is now at version 0.6.0; it built and upgraded on my desktop.
webkitgtk is now at version 2.16.6; it apparently switched from
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:31 AM, David Spencer <
> baildon.resea...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hmm, can I change my mind on that?
> >
> > I'm wrong, and as you initially said Eric, this would be the only
> > thing on SBo that absolutely requires x86_64 + multilib. Everything
> > else will
16 matches
Mail list logo