Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuild with Two Executables

2022-03-23 Thread Brandon Pribula
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022, 1:16 PM B. Watson, wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Brandon Pribula wrote: > > > Well for the environment variable approach I wanted to give the option of > > installing both, so in that case the executables would have to have > > different names. So in terms of the script

[Slackbuilds-users] Updated ftbfs list

2022-03-23 Thread B. Watson
Fixed a few of these, removed a few: https://slackware.uk/~urchlay/src/ftbfs.32bit.20220323 Same URL as previous version of the list, make sure you're not working from an outdated copy. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuild with Two Executables

2022-03-23 Thread B. Watson
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Brandon Pribula wrote: Well for the environment variable approach I wanted to give the option of installing both, so in that case the executables would have to have different names. So in terms of the script I thought it would make sense to just have distinct names for th

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuild with Two Executables

2022-03-23 Thread Brandon Pribula
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:45 PM Brandon Pribula wrote: > Thanks for the example, Jeremy :) > > Although I've written shell scripts before these will be my first > slackbuilds and I'm second guessing everything (I guess want everything to > be perfect) so this example really helped. > > On Tue, M

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuild with Two Executables

2022-03-23 Thread Brandon Pribula
Thanks for the example, Jeremy :) Although I've written shell scripts before these will be my first slackbuilds and I'm second guessing everything (I guess want everything to be perfect) so this example really helped. On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:32 PM Jeremy Hansen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022,

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuild with Two Executables

2022-03-23 Thread Brandon Pribula
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:43 PM B. Watson wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Brandon Pribula wrote: > > > For the option of using an ENV variable, can it also be used to install > both > > scripts as long as makepkg isn't called twice? > > > Then just use appname for the package name no matter wh

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] codeblocks slackbuild slarm64

2022-03-23 Thread Ralph Spitzner
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote on 3/23/22 6:25 PM: Please note that 15.0+ and ARM are both not officially supported by SBo We can add that, but we can't really test it I just built it on slarm64, it works and doesn't hurt anyone/thing... :-) -rasp -- "ich brauche keine Verschluesselun

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] codeblocks slackbuild slarm64

2022-03-23 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> without this configure can't find the version of libboost (on > slarm/slackware64/ aarch64) on 15.0 + > > --- codeblocks.SlackBuild~  2022-03-23 15:27:29.055474367 +0100 > +++ codeblocks.SlackBuild   2022-03-23 15:42:48.790231733 +0100 > @@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ >  elif [ "$ARCH" = "x86_64" ];

[Slackbuilds-users] codeblocks slackbuild slarm64

2022-03-23 Thread Ralph Spitzner
without this configure can't find the version of libboost (on slarm/slackware64/ aarch64) on 15.0 + -rasp --- codeblocks.SlackBuild~ 2022-03-23 15:27:29.055474367 +0100 +++ codeblocks.SlackBuild 2022-03-23 15:42:48.790231733 +0100 @@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ elif [ "$ARCH" = "x86_64

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] fcron for 15.0

2022-03-23 Thread Richard Narron
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Michel BEGUE wrote: > fcron does not build. > just a line to add to ./configure > " --with-sendmail=/usr/sbin/postfix " I do not get any errors in building 3.3.0 With postfix installed, the fcron 3.3.0 build finds sendmail at /usr/sbin/sendmail. What error did you get

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Fixing 32 bit FTBFS

2022-03-23 Thread Erich Ritz via SlackBuilds-users
opment cycle). > > Here's the list of failed builds: > https://slackware.uk/~urchlay/src/ftbfs.32bit.20220323 > > Please test them on clean environment (VM or Chroot) with latest -Stable > Update > > Thank you > > -- > > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo > > syst

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Fixing 32 bit FTBFS

2022-03-23 Thread Ozan Türkyılmaz
ist of failed builds: > https://slackware.uk/~urchlay/src/ftbfs.32bit.20220323 > > Please test them on clean environment (VM or Chroot) with latest - > Stable > Update I started installing 32 bit Slackware chroot right now. I'll take look at handbrake. My system is 64 bit originall

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Fixing 32 bit FTBFS

2022-03-23 Thread B. Watson
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, B. Watson wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: Here's the list of failed builds: https://slackware.uk/~urchlay/src/ftbfs.32bit.20220323 Addendum: ignore onevpl, from that list. It can only be built on x86_64, 32-bit builds are impossibl

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Fixing 32 bit FTBFS

2022-03-23 Thread B. Watson
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: Here's the list of failed builds: https://slackware.uk/~urchlay/src/ftbfs.32bit.20220323 Addendum: ignore onevpl, from that list. It can only be built on x86_64, 32-bit builds are impossible (so don't waste your t

[Slackbuilds-users] Fixing 32 bit FTBFS

2022-03-23 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
Hi everyone we are still fixing 32 bit failures and we think it could go faster if the community are involved (like what we did during development cycle). Here's the list of failed builds: https://slackware.uk/~urchlay/src/ftbfs.32bit.20220323 Please test them on clean environment (VM or C