Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20240106.1

On Sat, 6 Jan 2024, at 9:47 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > Please note that all new submission MUST be submitted via normal > submisison form in order to get it populated in the database during > public update. Updates to existing scripts can be done in both ways (via > Github PR or Gitlab

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] sboinstall chromprint fails

On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, at 11:26 AM, Ed Fletcher wrote: > I was surprised that sbotools defaults to current. It's not mentioned > anywhere that I could find. Maybe that could be included on the > SlackBuilds page, with what to change it to for 15.0? sbotools needs a new maintainer, the last commi

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] sboinstall chromprint fails

On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, at 8:37 AM, Ed Fletcher wrote: > I don't think so. I've got sbotools v2.7 and didn't make any > configuration changes. My understanding is that sbo gets the version of > slackware from the system it's running on and uses that to get the > correct packages. Perhaps from /e

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Virtualbox

Hi Heinz, I'm pretty sure the version of VirtualBox on SBo (6.1.34) is borked for some particular Windows version, I had endless problems until I updated to virtualbox-6.1.40 from your repo. I think at a minimum the soon to be EOL(?) 6.x branch should be updated to the latest, just for compatibi

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Virtualbox

I'm not too sure why the maintainer is not pushing an update, probably busy? There are some of the maintainer's build scripts here though that are updated: https://repo.liwjatan.org/pprkut/15.0/source/ https://repo.liwjatan.org/pprkut/current/source/ On Thu, 11 May 2023, at 12:13 AM, Jim wrote:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] LibreOffice vs libreoffice (confusing, too vague)

I wouldn't mind seeing binary repacks with -bin appended. I'd have to rename some of my own builds, but at least there's some information in the title. Differentiating by capitalization seems very arbitrary. On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 2:53 PM, B. Watson wrote: > On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, Christoph Willin

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221223.1

Looks like it breaks jbig2enc as well: > checking for findFileFormatStream in -llept... no > Error! Leptonica not detected. > Failures: > jbig2enc: jbig2enc.SlackBuild return non-zero On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, at 10:24 PM, Alexander Verbovetsky wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:28:04AM +0700, Wil

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SoulSeek?

I think Linux development on the official client is dead, 2018 is the last Linux release: https://www.slsknet.org/news/node/1 Nicotine+ is where it's at :) On Tue, 26 Apr 2022, at 12:02 AM, Dominik Drobek wrote: > W dniu 25.04.2022 o 02:15, David Chmelik pisze: >> I'd still like to see the offi

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] abandoning all my slackbuilds

I'll grab qbittorrent. On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 1:34 AM, chytr...@sdf.org wrote: > I've abandoned all my slackbuilds. > > anorack [dependees] Donald Cooley > bamf [dependees] Donald Cooley > bitrot [dependees] Donald Cooley > discount [dependees] Donald Cooley > dos2unix [dependees] D

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] extra files in $PKG/install

On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, at 12:57 PM, B. Watson wrote: > The other possibility: if installpkg gets interrupted with ^C, it > might leave the /installpkg- stuff lying around just because it > got killed before it could remove it. This is it, I just tested it out, and ctrl-c fast enough during installpk

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] extra files in $PKG/install

On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, at 1:55 PM, Ozan Türkyılmaz wrote: > Do you remember what was inside? I just did a test build and install/ > only had slack-desc and doinst.sh. Unfortunately not, but "libebml" was in there somewhere. On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, at 2:30 PM, B. Watson wrote: > Possibly an older versi

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] extra files in $PKG/install

On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, at 1:55 AM, B. Watson wrote: > How many of you have files named like these? > > $ ls -d /installpkg-* Weirdly, I had one /installpkg-* type directory, with some libebml content. However, when I remove/rebuild/install libebml, I don't get the directory being created again, so

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] GNU parallel

It's in 15.0, and was added to -current (pre 15.0) back in 2018: Wed Apr 25 04:38:51 UTC 2018 [...] d/parallel-20180422-noarch-1.txz: Added. On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, at 8:04 PM, Judah Milgram wrote: > Hello, > > I got interested in trying GNU parallel: > > https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/ > >

[Slackbuilds-users] wire needs maintainer

Hello, Since I no longer use the program, I'm putting wire up for grabs. It's an easy one (binary repack), not often updated. -- Dave ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/sl

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SlackBuild silently quitting - Cmake - make install

On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, at 2:49 PM, B Watson wrote: > I *do* see a problem with it, it's running > glib-compile-schemas during the build, which means it overwrites > /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled on the build system (AKA > spamming the real filesystem). I'll patch it to avoid that...

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Looking for new signal-desktop maintainer

Thanks Greg! On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, at 9:29 PM, Greg' Ar Tourter wrote: > Hi David, > > I am happy to take this one over. I will submit an updated version using the > binary build as a PR a bit later. > > Cheers > > Greg > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 07:04, D

[Slackbuilds-users] New maintainer for olm

Hello, olm has a new maintainer, Roger Krowiak (cc'd). His updated SlackBuild is attached, thanks Roger! -- Dave olm.tar.gz Description: application/gzip ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.or

[Slackbuilds-users] Looking for new signal-desktop maintainer

Hello all, I'm looking to give up signal-desktop, as it's a fiddly source build, as well as suffering from binaries being frequently removed upstream (and I've started playing around with packaging it for my own repo). It's not the sort of package you can just leave without updates, as upstream

[Slackbuilds-users] pandoc-bin and `slackpkg clean-system`

I noticed recently that `slackpkg clean-system` is offering to remove pandoc-bin, even though I have "[0-9]+_SBo" in /etc/slackpkg/blacklist After some testing, I found that the problem is the arch. Installed as (by default): pandoc-bin-2.17.1.1-amd64-1_SBo.tgz `slackpkg clean-system` will offe

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] greenhorn greetings

On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, at 10:28 PM, k...@trixtar.org wrote: > - about when can I expect sbo packages for Sylpheed > and Librewolf, the two most pressing ones? Welcome to Slack :) This is a community run effort, so for anything eligible that's not on SBo yet (and Sylpheed already is), the answer t

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] best way to mass-rebuild? (w/dependencies?)

On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, at 3:44 PM, David Chmelik wrote: >     If I want to mass-rebuild all my installed packages in one go ('at > once') including w/queues, what's the best way?  I thought it was > sbotools, but depending what I used for end of package name (_SBo or > ponce,) sbotools seemed to

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackware 15.0 Released

On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, at 9:17 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > or directly send us pull request / merge request on github/gitlab or via > this mailing list (in .patch format would be better). Great to see 15.0 finally out! To which git repo should we be sending updates? __

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] What if we `source`d the version number

On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, at 5:39 AM, B Watson wrote: > It'd take away the ability to override VERSION in the environment. A lot > of us do this: > > VERSION=1.2.3 sh foo.SlackBuild > > ...to attempt to build a new version of 'foo' with the existing > script. Of course this doesn't always work, but it

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Upgrade 14.2 to TexLive2021 or just biblatex?

On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, at 1:24 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > Could I build the -current TexLive2021 in 14.2? Or should I upgrade > biblatex/Biber to 3.16? You can easily have the latest version of TeX Live installed if you use the official installer (it's non-intrusive and installs to /usr/local by def

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] pdfstudio and pdfstudioviewer up for grabs

On Sat, 31 Jul 2021, at 9:00 PM, Alexander Verbovetsky wrote: > They (the pdfstudio upstream) changed their minds and published .debs > for 64 bit version of pdfstudio and the viewer. (Probably, the Arch > developers were able to convince them.) > > Hence, I will continue to maintain pdfstudio an

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Proposal for build scripts

On Sat, 6 Mar 2021, at 4:11 AM, UpNort wrote: > Hi All, > > Proposal: SBo build scripts check locally for the downloaded sources and > validate the md5sum. I have to agree with Erich on this one, I think that work should be left for the 3rd party SBo maintenance tools. If you want something si

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] haskell/shellcheck cannot build

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021, at 10:56 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Many missing dependencies and this was after running sqg -p > haskell/shellcheck then building with that .sqf file. > Are the missing dependencies not yet available in slackbuilds archive yet > or does the build script need improving? It's

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Fresh soundkonverter download fails to buildx

On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, at 7:58 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > If it's user error I must be at fault, right? On a clean 14.2 (64-bit) install: > sbocheck > sboinstall soundkonverter and it builds fine. You could check this on a clean install (say in a VM) before posting for help, at least then you coul

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] geoclue2: wants optional dependencies [FIXED]

On Thu, 18 Feb 2021, at 3:28 PM, B Watson wrote: > On 2/17/21, Rich Shepard wrote: > > > > The one that's been here since 2017 was modified in 2018 to include the > > missing lines. I assumed that if the source tarballs were the same version > > the build scripts would also be the same. That's bee

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Docker command

On Sun, 24 Jan 2021, at 1:32 PM, be...@caraus.de wrote: > Check "docker-cli" package. Ah, thanks! ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lis

[Slackbuilds-users] Docker command

After a recent upgrade to docker (20.10.2) on -current, it seems that the `docker` binary is no longer around. It used to be there.. am I missing something here? -- Dave ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20210123.1

Looks like bat.info VERSION should 0.17.1 instead of 0.13.0.___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuild

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Fwd: ocaml Slackbuild on SBo

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, at 12:47 AM, Matteo Bernardini wrote: > unfortunately many things depend on ocaml and it's not enough to > update it to the latest version, you have to verify that whatever > depends on it (as mandatory or optional) still works after the update: > this is the work of a maintain

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FreeBASIC update fails

On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, at 12:20 PM, Didier Spaier wrote: > I don't know if this is an issue with the makefile, the SlackBuild > or a difference between Slint and Slackware (which I assume > unlikely, but I could be wrong). I don't have 14.2 to test any more, but building on regular Slackware -curre

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] FreeBASIC update fails

On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, at 11:10 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote: > This may be useful it's a typescript file stripped of the ansi characters. > > Script started on 2020-12-22 22:23:40-05:00 [TERM="linux" > TTY="/dev/tty1" COLUMNS="200" LINES="56"] Hmm, that was nearly 1MB of text inline. IMO better to use

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Add Autodetect to ffmpeg for Optional Dependencies

On Sat, 24 Oct 2020, at 5:02 PM, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > Heinz, > > So I decided to add autodetection for those packages into the SlackBuild > script itself and update the variables passed to the ./configure based on > that autodetection. pkg-config is used for most of them, but there's 7 > prog

[Slackbuilds-users] Signal-Desktop obsolete

Hello, just a heads up that Signal-Desktop-0.42.2 ought to be removed, it's from August 2017* and such a build will not function on the Signal network. In fact upstream now denies service after a client becomes too out of date (and three years is far beyond that limit). -- Dave * https://githu

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Version bumping SlackBuilds (sbup)

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, at 10:49 PM, David O'Shaughnessy wrote: > Hello all, here's a script I made for doing version bumps on > SlackBuilds (I get tired of doing this by hand). The idea is you can do > `sbup version` in a directory to version bump the .info and SlackBuil

[Slackbuilds-users] Version bumping SlackBuilds (sbup)

Hello all, here's a script I made for doing version bumps on SlackBuilds (I get tired of doing this by hand). The idea is you can do `sbup version` in a directory to version bump the .info and SlackBuild (i.e., version, download, and md5s). I'm only new to Python so I'd appreciate any comments,

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] JabRef 5.0 SlackBuild

For the JabRef 5 people, here's 5.1. On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, at 2:44 PM, David O'Shaughnessy wrote: > SlackBuild for JabRef 5.0 attached, for those interested. The new version > does away with jdk dep (they now bundle in their own jre)

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Last Update

On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, at 7:38 PM, Robby Workman wrote: > 06:16 <+rworkman> There was an unexpected hiccup in the shipping process. All > is well, or at least it will be, but the timeframe has been extended yet > again. > 06:16 <+rworkman> None of this is in our control. We don't like it either. >

[Slackbuilds-users] JabRef 5.0 SlackBuild

SlackBuild for JabRef 5.0 attached, for those interested. The new version does away with jdk dep (they now bundle in their own jre). -- Dave jabref-5.0.tar Description: Unix tar archive ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.o

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] newsboat fun

On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, at 11:56 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Finally got this built. > sbopkg can't build all of it though. > I built stfl in sbopkg separately and needed to run gem install > asciidoctor before sbopkg -i newsboat was able to build newsboat. > No problem though, things like this make li

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Dependency cleanup after package removal

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, at 7:56 PM, Dominik Drobek wrote: > I was wondering how do people manage dependency cleanup when > uninstalling SBo packages? sboremove from sbotools is one way to handle this. `sboremove foo` would offer to uninstall any dependencies of 'foo' that aren't required by other i

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates 20200601

On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, at 2:05 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > we are a bit late on this update, but here's a good news: > Heinz has pushed a new update on virtualbox to build the latest > virtualbox 6.1.8 It's targetting for -current (or future 15.0 > repository), but for those who wanted to use

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Remove libaom...

On Sun, 24 May 2020, at 12:14 AM, andrew wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Your detective work is amazing! As to your suggestion: B Watson gets the credit for that! But I can't believe they create the archive on the fly, what exactly is the point of it? O_o -- Dave _

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Remove libaom...

On Sat, 23 May 2020, at 12:18 PM, D Woodfall wrote: > On 23/05/20 20:00, > andrew put forth the proposition: > > > > The new 'aom' is the replacement / update for 'libaom', could libaom > > be removed from SBo? > > >From aom.info: https://aomedia.googlesource.com/aom/+archive/bb35ba9148543f22ba7

[Slackbuilds-users] aspell6-es

Just found out that aspell6-es is redundant since it's already in /extra, so it can be dropped from SBo. -- Dave ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archiv

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] bat: failed build (newer rust required?)

On Tue, 5 May 2020, at 12:05 AM, Erich Ritz via SlackBuilds-users wrote: > Hi Benjamin and list, > > Trying to build system/bat from a 64-bit chroot using sbopkg I get the > following error: > > ... > Compiling git2 v0.13.3 > error: enum variants on type aliases are experimental > --> /tmp/SBo

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] BeautifulSoup4 not building

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020, at 9:57 AM, Dave Woodfall wrote: > Did you find a solution to this? > > I get the same error when building in a chroot, but it builds fine on > the host machine. It doesn't seem to matter it bs4 is already > installed or not. I can't get the build to fail on -current or 14.2

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20200328.1

On Sat, 28 Mar 2020, at 9:46 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > > I just had an issue here with snappy. The build wasn't successful: it > > stopped with a lot of errors when linking a unitttest. > > > > I could find a solution googling a little and so I'm offering a patch > > which hopefully may

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Last Saturday's updates

Another option is to follow the RSS feed: https://slackbuilds.org/rss/ChangeLog.rss -- Dave ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.sla

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] JabRef-5.x

On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, at 8:40 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > Mario, et al.: > > SBo has version 2.9.2 of JabRef (the bibliographic reference database > management system) which is so far past its best-used-by date that it has > mold on it. :-) JabRef 5.0 has now been released. -- Dave

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] OpenJDK11/openJFX11 and JabRef5.x

On Mon, 26 Aug 2019, at 7:28 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > JabRef-5.x requires JDK11. Oracle has split this into parts so the JavaFK > part is now a separate package. A JabRef dev confirmed that it will run with > openjdk11 and openjfx11. The SBo repository has a zulu-openjdk11-11.0.1-lts > package, bu

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] anyone have LukenShiro email address?

Just out of interest, there's also jdupes which claims to have a big speed increase over fdupes (not a drop-in replacement though, commandline switches are different). -- Dave On Sat, 1 Feb 2020, at 3:21 PM, Fernando Lopez wrote: > thank you. ill take that

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] building packages

On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, at 12:42 PM, Ruben Schuller wrote: > I'm interested in what you use to build packages and how you do it. > I currently use slackrepo [1] for this. It seems to be a bit abandoned > now, a pull request I've made 2018 wasn't reacted upon. So I'm kind-of > looking for a replacement

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Unmaintained builds - want any of these?

On Thu, 2 Jan 2020, at 8:38 AM, David O'Shaughnessy wrote: > > I didn't see anything in the list that I use, but I think office/org-mode can > just be dropped since org is included in Emacs by default now: > > https://orgmode.org/manual/Installation.html > I see

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Unmaintained builds - want any of these?

On Thu, 2 Jan 2020, at 12:41 AM, Robby Workman wrote: > TL;DR version: if you would like to see any of the scripts on the > following list stay around, please step up to maintain them. > > https://slackbuilds.org/DeadSBoBuilds > I didn't see anything in the list that I use, but I think office/or

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] apg-2.2.3 automated password generator

On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, at 9:33 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote: > One improvement that could be done to all of these password generators > is to make sure every password starts with a letter and ends with a > letter. That makes passwords more difficult by a little to crack. The > reason for that is mathema

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] signal-desktop: MD5sum problem

On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, at 5:31 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > it has been fixed in my branch since yesterday > people need to look on the git page :) > https://slackbuilds.org/ready/ Thanks, didn't know about that link. -- Dave___ SlackBuilds-users m

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] signal-desktop: MD5sum problem

Yeah it's wrong, someone reported this in another thread too. I assume it will be fixed the next update. Upstream is: https://updates.signal.org/desktop/apt/pool/main/s/signal-desktop/signal-desktop_1.27.2_amd64.deb And the correct MD5 is 21d439b48746ac81c857c21228c37224 -- Dave On Sun, 15 Sep

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20190914.1

Sorry, I forgot to update it. It should be: 21d439b48746ac81c857c21228c37224 For verification upstream is: https://updates.signal.org/desktop/apt/pool/main/s/signal-desktop/signal-desktop_1.27.2_amd64.deb -- Dave On Sat, 14 Sep 2019, at 1:18 AM, Cristiano Urban wrote: > Hi, > there is a wrong

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SOHO backup choices

On Tue, 10 Sep 2019, at 7:41 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > The two packages that look appropriate for my SOHO needs (and I didn't look > at all of them) are flexbackup and Attic. Both do daily incremental backups > for single hosts or small LANs. Should I install and learn both to support a > choice or

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request: add $NUMJOBS to SBo build scripts

On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, at 12:04 PM, Fellype wrote: > Dear SBo Admins, > > Is it possible to add the $NUMJOBS variable to SBo build scripts by default? > At least for the next Slackware release? I think that this can be more reliably handled by the user's interface to SBo. For example, sbotools le

[Slackbuilds-users] gnucash 3.6

Anyone having trouble building gnucash 3.6 after the latest updates on -current? I'm getting a failure on configure: > -- Performing Test have_mod_mask > -- Performing Test have_mod_mask - Success > CMake Error at gnucash/register/register-gnome/CMakeLists.txt:4 > (check_symbol_exists): > Unkno

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20190427.1

On Sun, 28 Apr 2019, at 2:17 PM, Cristiano Urban wrote: > Hi, > there is an issue with the download URL for signal-desktop. The file seems to > be not present at the location pointed by that URL. > I forgot to mirror the file, fixed now :) -- Dave___

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackware and SlackBuilds.org cited in a scientific publication

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019, at 8:44 AM, Petar Petrov wrote: > Dear All, > > I am happy to let you know Slackware and SlackBuilds.org were cited in > the most recent publication of our group. The paper is called > "Computational analysis of the evolutionarily conserved Missing In > Metastasis/Metastasis S

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] vlc slackbuild

On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, at 3:38 PM, Lenard Spencer wrote: > It's happening with me as well. I'll post a log as soon as I can. Odd, I just re-built VLC on 14.2_64 and it runs without problem. Might be something to do with certain build options? -- Dave___

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20190217.1

On Sun, 17 Feb 2019, at 7:07 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > sorry for the delay for this batch, due to some real life work :) No need to apologize Willy, thanks for your efforts :) -- Dave___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbu

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] libreoffice 6.2 (RPM's) runtime failure

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, at 4:08 PM, Duncan Roe wrote: > I am getting the following error: > > > 11:01:56$ libreoffice6.2 ~/calendar.ods > > /opt/libreoffice6.2/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error: > > /opt/libreoffice6.2/program/libvclplug_gtk3lo.so: undefined symbol: > > gdk_wayland_display_g

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Chromium in Slackbuilds

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, at 5:44 PM, JCA wrote: > The version of the Chromium from Slackbuilds is 53, whereas the latest is 71. > I.e. 53 is well over two years old. Why is it being kept that old, especially > bearing in mind that Slackware packages for the latest Chromium may be > downloaded from h

[Slackbuilds-users] borgbackup msgpack-python problem

I'm having trouble with borgbackup on 14.2_64. Here's the error message upon running borg init . > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/borg", line 6, in > from pkg_resources import load_entry_point > File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", > l

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Drop package (riot-web)

1 PM, psychi wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I'd like to take over it. > I have not register an account on Sbo.org yet. > And what is the procedure of taking over for the Slackbuild, BTW? > > Cheers > Linus > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 04:44, David O'Shaughnessy <

[Slackbuilds-users] Drop package (riot-web)

Hi, I'd like to drop riot-web from the repo (unless someone else wants to take over for it). There's some weird bug in the 0.17.0 branch which stops the program from loading under some strange conditions (and which didn't turn up on my system until just recently), and I don't really have time for i

[Slackbuilds-users] Legacy Signal-Desktop to be retired

Just a heads up that the Signal-Desktop SlackBuild (not signal-desktop) will no longer work after 15th Nov 2018: > After 380 days of extended support, the legacy Chrome version of > Signal Desktop will stop working on November 15, 2018. The new > standalone version of Signal Desktop is available n

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] MD5 hash sums

On 08/23/2018 03:45 PM, T3 slider wrote: > The download files do not necessarily have to be tar archives, and in > some cases (generally those with multiple download files and therefore > multiple checksums), individual files can be included for download. > Intentional PDF collisions have been arou

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] MD5 hash sums

On 08/23/2018 12:55 AM, t...@airmail.cc wrote: > Sorry, the question I had in mind was about MD5 sums inside it. Seems > kind of strange that SlackBuild archive is protected by GPG signature, > but the actual source tarball is not signed and is protected by > (obsolete) MD5 checksum. Aren't this si

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] MD5 hash sums

On 08/21/2018 09:32 PM, t...@airmail.cc wrote: > Hello. > > I have a question about DOWNLOAD and MD5SUM variables in the > .info files. > > As this page https://www.gnupg.org/faq/weak-digest-algos.html states: > >> It is better to entirely avoid the MD5 algorithm and don't put any >> value in si

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Retire MD5 for SHA256

On 08/22/2018 12:46 AM, David O'Shaughnessy wrote: > The problem then is that the MD5 cannot guarantee that a given (future) > source archive is identical to the one that the maintainer originally > downloaded, and that the SBo admin signed off on. Obviously though if > the attac

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Retire MD5 for SHA256

On 08/10/2018 05:24 PM, B Watson wrote: > This comes up from time to time... I personally am not opposed to it, > theoretically it's a good idea, but it'd be a good bit of work for > everyone (admins, maintainers, even users would be impacted). > > What might be feasible: have each maintainer GPG

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Retire MD5 for SHA256

On 08/10/2018 11:24 PM, Tim Dickson via SlackBuilds-users wrote: > my 2cents worth... > if it aint broke... > well, the argument is that it is broke, but... using hash collisions  > means either the source can be compromised, in which case it is not > reliable, or the compromise is done on the netw

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] signal-desktop

On 08/21/2018 04:22 PM, B Watson wrote: > On 8/20/18, David O'Shaughnessy wrote: >> Do I need to do anything else after uploading an archive >> to the sbodirectlinks site? > > Yes. Actually change the download link in the .info file to point to > the sbodirectlinks

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] signal-desktop

On 08/21/2018 05:20 AM, B Watson wrote: > signal-desktop doesn't keep old versions, so the download link keeps > breaking... but someone packages it for gentoo, so you could use their > distfiles server as the download link in your .info file. I noticed this problem and have been uploading archive

[Slackbuilds-users] Retire MD5 for SHA256

Hi everyone, since SBo relies on maintainers to individually verify the authenticity of source archives (i.e., check the signature and provide a checksum), the user's link to upstream verification rests on the SBo published checksum. Given that MD5 is badly broken, would it not be more prudent to p

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] bad downloads, courtesy of sbosrcarch

On 07/23/2018 03:57 PM, B Watson wrote: > However, you could get yourself a sourceforge account and get added > to the slackbuildsdirectlinks project, upload files that way. Not sure > who's in charge of that (it isn't me) but it's someone on this list who > will likely be replying to this message

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] bad downloads, courtesy of sbosrcarch

On 07/17/2018 06:06 AM, B Watson wrote: > If they start pulling old releases regularly, before you have time > to notice and update the build, maybe someone on this list could help > you out by hosting the .deb file somewhere? You'd use their URL as the > download link, and it would keep working ev

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] bad downloads, courtesy of sbosrcarch

On 07/15/2018 06:06 PM, B Watson wrote: > 404 Not Found: > > network/signal-desktop Ok thanks. They don't normally remove release files, but they must have pulled 1.14.0 for some reason. The current version is 1.14.1 and I've submitted an update for that. > The entire website for signal-desktop'

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [OT] Screen grabber ?

On 06/27/2018 01:05 AM, Xavier Maillard wrote: > I am debugging a tool which does not react correctly when trying to > interrupt it. The project owner would like me to give him 1) the way > to reproduce the problem and 2) a "screenshot". > > I tried to look for a tool from the SBo repository but a

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Rebuilding all SBo packages on new system

On 06/08/2018 03:11 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > >> Sounds like David Spencer's slackrepo would be ideal for your situation. >> http://idlemoor.github.io/slackrepo/ > > Jeremy, > >   Thank you. I'll get a copy and learn how to use it. > > Best regards, >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 is sorely in need of an update

On 06/04/2018 07:15 PM, Harald Achitz wrote: > If it doesn’t work with 5.9.x than it has a problem and is not worth > using it > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 at 06:15, David Woodfall > wrote: > > On Sunday 3 June 2018 20:05, > Harald Achitz

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] firejail

On 05/19/2018 11:28 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: Thanks for reporting David, can you take this as well, sorry for troubling you again :( I don't recall being asked to do anything recently :) Er, I think Willy meant me :) 26 hours since my previous Multiple Dave Correction :) Yes, i m

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] firejail

On 05/19/2018 07:26 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: Thanks for reporting David, can you take this as well, sorry for troubling you again :( I don't recall being asked to do anything recently :) But if you are asking me to take over the Firejail SlackBuild I can do that, otherwise all good

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] firejail

On 05/18/2018 10:17 PM, John wrote: firejail chokes on latest firefox-60.0.1 I had a bunch of errors also, bumping Firejail to the latest version seems to fix it. -- Dave diff --git a/system/firejail/firejail.SlackBuild b/system/firejail/firejail.SlackBuild index 8219295202..bc569525f9 10064

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Build failure: gnucash 2.6.19

On 04/01/2018 06:00 PM, King Beowulf wrote: > Did you first remove/uninstall the older version? Seems gnucash compile > can fail otherwise. This was mentioned in this list a year or so ago. Thanks, that was the problem. The build completes when the old version is removed beforehand. Btw, it migh

[Slackbuilds-users] Build failure: gnucash 2.6.19

I'm having trouble building the latest gnucash 2.6.19. The last bit of error output is: > libtool: link: gcc -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -fPIC -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-unused -o .libs/gnucash gnucas

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] article about slackware.

On 02/09/2018 03:25 AM, Doogster wrote: > Where do Slackers go to irc? > ##slackware on Freenode seems like the main game. There's a Matrix channel (https://matrix.to/#/#slackware:matrix.org), but nothing much happening there yet. -- Dave ___ SlackBuil

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] New layout of https://slackbuilds.org/

On 02/05/2018 04:07 PM, Μιχάλης Μιχαλούδης wrote: > I had *terrified* with some comments here so I was skeptical before visiting. > > _I like the new site._ It's better for me. > > Thank you guys. I'm happy with it too, looks like a worthwhile update to me. -- Dave _

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] fzf 0.17.1 build failure

On 11/03/2017 03:03 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: >> I don't think that is the problem, since I do all my SBo stuff with "su >> -" these days (including for google-go-lang). Maybe I am missing >> something else, but I have no idea what. > > Well, i just tried to build fzf and it went fine > af

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] fzf 0.17.1 build failure

On 11/02/2017 09:46 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > > please make sure you use "su -" instead of just regular su when building > with google-go-lang since it needs to have correct environment variable. > Other alternative is to log out and re-login before building > I don't think that is the

[Slackbuilds-users] fzf 0.17.1 build failure

I'm having trouble building fzf 0.17.1 on Slack 14.2. I'm guessing this has something to do with the google-go-lang dependency (which I've installed). Some of the fzf errors look like: > fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /) > Stopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVER

  1   2   >