Re: [Slackbuilds-users] blender: needs python to build?

On Oct 23, 2016 3:33 PM, "Fernando Lopez" wrote: > > Yes. I meant Blender. that sucks. =( You're going to have a severely limited system without Python. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] blender: needs python to build?

Yes. I meant Blender. that sucks. =( On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Christoph Willing < chris.will...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > On 24/10/16 02:47, Fernando Lopez wrote: > >> Do I really need python to build? I would like to disable python. >> >> I guess you mean Blender (not blender). If it is

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] blender: needs python to build?

On 24/10/16 02:47, Fernando Lopez wrote: Do I really need python to build? I would like to disable python. I guess you mean Blender (not blender). If it is possible, you'll probably lose much functionality. My built package has 2407 file entries (from tar tvf Blender-2.78-... |wc -l) and 989

[Slackbuilds-users] blender: needs python to build?

Do I really need python to build? I would like to disable python. -- Regards, Fernando Lopez Jr. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender: wrong desktop menu category

On 01/13/2016 11:49 AM, Ryan P.C. McQuen wrote: >> For those concerned about minimal interference with upstream, the > original blender.desktop (attached) from the source tarball (but not > included in binary tarball) has: >> Categories=Graphics;3DGraphics; >> >> >> chris > > This IS

[Slackbuilds-users] Blender: wrong desktop menu category

Hi, I just installed Blender (or more exactly 'blender', the repackaged binary). Thanks to Ryan P.C. McQuen for his work on that. There's a small mistake in blender.desktop. The application is listed in the Audio/Video category, but it's a 3D modelization software, so the corresponding line

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender: wrong desktop menu category

I would vote Multimedia, actually. Yes it does 3d modeling, but it also does rigging, 3d animation, and even 2d animation. And technically video editing but...don't get me started. -klaatu On 01/12/2016 09:54 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed Blender (or more exactly

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender: wrong desktop menu category

On Jan 12, 2016 6:03 PM, "Klaatu" wrote: > > I would vote Multimedia, actually. Yes it does 3d modeling, but it also > does rigging, 3d animation, and even 2d animation. And technically video > editing but...don't get me started. So true, blender is quite the swiss

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender: wrong desktop menu category

> For those concerned about minimal interference with upstream, the original blender.desktop (attached) from the source tarball (but not included in binary tarball) has: > Categories=Graphics;3DGraphics; > > > chris This IS Slackware, I will defer to upstream here and use their listing.

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender: wrong desktop menu category

On 12/01/16 18:54, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Hi, I just installed Blender (or more exactly 'blender', the repackaged binary). Thanks to Ryan P.C. McQuen for his work on that. There's a small mistake in blender.desktop. The application is listed in the Audio/Video category, but it's a 3D

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender: wrong desktop menu category

Le 12/01/2016 11:33, Ryan P.C. McQuen a écrit : > So true, blender is quite the swiss army knife ... If enough people want > it moved we should consider it, but multimedia seems like the proper > place to me as well. :^) OK, well, this is only a minor configuration detail. Thanks again for this

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

On 04/01/16 02:21, Audrius Kažukauskas wrote: On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 12:57:53 +0200, Panagiotis Nikolaou wrote: Hi to all and happy new year! I have notice Blender needing "libpython3.4m.so.1.0", while python3 (3.5.1) provides "libpython3.5m.so.1.0". This makes Blender impossible to run without

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

On 08/01/16 22:00, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: Also, a reminder that due to the versions of openexr and ilmbase packages included in 14.1, Blender 2.74 is the most recent Blender version which can be built with this script. However the most recent Blender (version 2.76b) can be built on

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

> Also, a reminder that due to the versions of openexr and ilmbase > packages included in 14.1, Blender 2.74 is the most recent Blender > version which can be built with this script. However the most recent > Blender (version 2.76b) can be built on -current with this SlackBuild > just by

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

> OK, from that commit, it looks like 14.2's plain 'openjpeg' package will > eventually (when changes TODO are done) satisfy Blender. > > Willy, could you therefore remove the last paragraph from the > README.Slackware file in my recent submission please? Or should I resubmit? No need i have

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/02/2016 04:29 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: >>> Hi to all and happy new year! >>> I have notice Blender needing >>> "libpython3.4m.so.1.0", while python3 >>> (3.5.1) provides "libpython3.5m.so.1.0". >>> This makes Blender impossible to

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 12:57:53 +0200, Panagiotis Nikolaou wrote: > Hi to all and happy new year! > I have notice Blender needing "libpython3.4m.so.1.0", while python3 > (3.5.1) provides "libpython3.5m.so.1.0". > This makes Blender impossible to run without downgrading to an older > python3 version

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

> You have Blender linked against Python 3.4, now you need to rebuild it > to link against Python 3.5. This is nothing Blender specific, you need > to do that for every package that links against Python 3.4. I tried to build Blender from scratch on a clean VM and here's what i got [ 78%]

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

>> Hi to all and happy new year! >> I have notice Blender needing "libpython3.4m.so.1.0", while python3 >> (3.5.1) provides "libpython3.5m.so.1.0". >> This makes Blender impossible to run without downgrading to an older >> python3 version or make a symlink >> from "libpython3.5m.so.1.0" to

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Blender

> Hi to all and happy new year! > I have notice Blender needing "libpython3.4m.so.1.0", while python3 > (3.5.1) provides "libpython3.5m.so.1.0". > This makes Blender impossible to run without downgrading to an older > python3 version or make a symlink > from "libpython3.5m.so.1.0" to

[Slackbuilds-users] Blender

Hi to all and happy new year! I have notice Blender needing "libpython3.4m.so.1.0", while python3 (3.5.1) provides "libpython3.5m.so.1.0". This makes Blender impossible to run without downgrading to an older python3 version or make a symlink from "libpython3.5m.so.1.0" to "libpython3.4m.so.1.0".