Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Concerning: [slackware-security] pidgin (SSA:2012-195-02)

2012-07-18 Thread Adis Nezirovic
Most of the time, security update is minor version update, so it's enough to change version numbers in slackbuild, end everything should build fine. So, there is no need to wait for anyone, this is Slackware, You take care of yourself :-) Best regards, Adis ___

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Concerning: [slackware-security] pidgin (SSA:2012-195-02)

2012-07-15 Thread Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejer
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:48:31 -0700 "Bradley D. Thornton" wrote: [...] > There are plenty of SBo's that we don't get any sort of security > notification on, and while it is prudent to follow the security lists > for any such app that you install, I think that with regards to SBo's > most of us don'

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Concerning: [slackware-security] pidgin (SSA:2012-195-02)

2012-07-15 Thread Black Rider
I keep an eye on the following sites to know of software vulnerabilities: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search http://packetstormsecurity.org/ There are times when vulnerabilities are not quickly addressed in SBo, because it takes time to update/approve the new updates in the repository. How

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Concerning: [slackware-security] pidgin (SSA:2012-195-02)

2012-07-14 Thread T3slider
I personally keep any packages built by SBo SlackBuilds up to date with the version hosted on slackbuilds.org (sbopkg makes this easy). If there is reason not to for a specific application, then it is my job to make sure it is patched. Other than that, SBo relies on its maintainers for security upd

[Slackbuilds-users] Concerning: [slackware-security] pidgin (SSA:2012-195-02)

2012-07-14 Thread Bradley D. Thornton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 07/14/2012 11:49 AM, Slackware Security Team wrote: > > [slackware-security] pidgin (SSA:2012-195-02) > > New pidgin packages are available for Slackware 12.2, 13.0, 13.1, 13.37, > and -current to fix security issues. Something that I had