Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Is the pyparsing SlackBuild still needed?

2017-03-25 Thread Audrius Kažukauskas
On Sat, 2017-03-25 at 03:55:25 +0100, Kees Theunissen wrote: > Hello, > > The slackware package python-setuptools-22.0.5-x86_64-1 contains > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/_vendor/pyparsing.py > and > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/_vendor/pyparsing.pyc > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Is the pyparsing SlackBuild still needed?

2017-03-25 Thread Barry Grundy
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Kees Theunissen wrote: > Hello, > > The slackware package python-setuptools-22.0.5-x86_64-1 contains > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/_vendor/pyparsing.py > and > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/_vendor/pyparsing.pyc > > So

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Is the pyparsing SlackBuild still needed?

2017-03-24 Thread B Watson
On 3/24/17, Kees Theunissen wrote: > The pyparsing SlackBuild is currently required as a first level > dependency by: spice packaging pydot matplotlib sqlpp11 snuggs puddletag > flexget enki plaso targetcli-fb letsencrypt Remove it, and see if that stuff still builds and runs? __

[Slackbuilds-users] Is the pyparsing SlackBuild still needed?

2017-03-24 Thread Kees Theunissen
Hello, The slackware package python-setuptools-22.0.5-x86_64-1 contains /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/_vendor/pyparsing.py and /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/_vendor/pyparsing.pyc So I'm wondering if there is still a need for a separate pyparsing SBo Slack