On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:14:11 +0100
Serban Udrea wrote:
> >> At the moment I use
> >>
> >> chown -R $UID:$GROUPS .
>
> > It's wrong, since the standard is to have executables owned as
> > root:root.
>
> Not necessarily wrong, if you run the script as root you get the
> right ownership. Moreover
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serban Udrea <
serban.ud...@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> Hello!
Hello!
I dare to disagree with other posters.I actually do not understand why
> anything else but installing the final package needs root rights. I am
> (still) working on some packa
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Serban Udrea wrote:
Marco Bonetti wrote:
On Wed, February 11, 2009 11:39, Serban Udrea wrote:
Another point is that all the SlackBuilds I looked at have
chown -R root:root .
which doesn't work if you are a normal user (at least on my machine).
At the moment I use
chown
Marco Bonetti wrote:
On Wed, February 11, 2009 11:39, Serban Udrea wrote:
Another point is that all the SlackBuilds I looked at have
chown -R root:root .
which doesn't work if you are a normal user (at least on my machine).
At the moment I use
chown -R $UID:$GROUPS .
which seems to work OK
On Wed, February 11, 2009 11:39, Serban Udrea wrote:
> Another point is that all the SlackBuilds I looked at have
>
> chown -R root:root .
>
> which doesn't work if you are a normal user (at least on my machine).
>
> At the moment I use
>
> chown -R $UID:$GROUPS .
>
> which seems to work OK but I d
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:59, Phillip Warner wrote:
> --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Chess Griffin wrote:
>
> > So, the question is: how many people feel strongly about
> > keeping the
> > ability to run sbopkg as a non-root user? Could folks
> > adapt to using
> > sbopkg only as root?
>
> ROOT-only so
Chess Griffin wrote:
Sorry for the cross-post to sbopkg and slackbuilds.org mailing lists but
I want to get as much feedback as possible.
>
Hello!
I dare to disagree with other posters. I actually do not understand why
anything else but installing the final package needs root rights. I am
(s
Chess Griffin wrote:
..Could folks adapt to using
sbopkg only as root?
Yes, root only sounds good.
Greetings :)
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Arch
--- On Tue, 2/10/09, Chess Griffin wrote:
> So, the question is: how many people feel strongly about
> keeping the
> ability to run sbopkg as a non-root user? Could folks
> adapt to using
> sbopkg only as root?
ROOT-only sounds fine to me. The main use of a non-root user for me would be
for
I use only by root
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:26 AM, alkos333 wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Chess Griffin
> wrote:
> > Sorry for the cross-post to sbopkg and slackbuilds.org mailing lists but
> > I want to get as much feedback as possible.
> >
> > Currently, sbopkg can be run by
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Chess Griffin wrote:
> Sorry for the cross-post to sbopkg and slackbuilds.org mailing lists but
> I want to get as much feedback as possible.
>
> Currently, sbopkg can be run by root or a non-root user. Certain
> functions or features can only be done by a root us
Sorry for the cross-post to sbopkg and slackbuilds.org mailing lists but
I want to get as much feedback as possible.
Currently, sbopkg can be run by root or a non-root user. Certain
functions or features can only be done by a root user, of course, like
building and installing packages. However,
12 matches
Mail list logo
