Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot slackbuild broken due to python3 changes

2019-06-20 Thread Christoph Willing
On 19/6/19 10:46 pm, Christoph Willing wrote: > On 18/6/19 2:32 pm, Kent Fritz wrote: >> I had a number of problems getting openshot running on a new >> workstation, most of them self-inflicted due to packages that were >> installed before I installed python3. >> >> However, openshot requires

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot slackbuild broken due to python3 changes

2019-06-19 Thread Christoph Willing
On 18/6/19 2:32 pm, Kent Fritz wrote: > I had a number of problems getting openshot running on a new > workstation, most of them self-inflicted due to packages that were > installed before I installed python3. > > However, openshot requires python-requests, which requires > python-certifi, which

[Slackbuilds-users] Openshot slackbuild broken due to python3 changes

2019-06-17 Thread Kent Fritz
I had a number of problems getting openshot running on a new workstation, most of them self-inflicted due to packages that were installed before I installed python3. However, openshot requires python-requests, which requires python-certifi, which had python3 support removed last month and put

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-24 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2016-10-24 9:43 GMT+02:00 Christoph Willing : > I can take openshot. thanks Chris, I'm sure it will be in good hands! > However goocanvas and pygoocanvas are not used in the new version (which > needs several other new SlackBuilds instead) so someone else should take

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-24 Thread Christoph Willing
On 23/10/16 16:44, Matteo Bernardini wrote: 2016-10-22 10:07 GMT+02:00 : Good morning everyone Is it likely that we will see a move towards the latest release of Openshot please? I am asking because I wondered, not withstanding and respecting maintainers'

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-23 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2016-10-23 10:56 GMT+02:00 : > @Matteo - yes I can understand why you dont want to go to the trouble with > having to update everythingeven I can appreciate what a task can unfold > :-) Shame though as Openshot (though was buggy at times) was easy to >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-23 Thread bch
Good morning everyone Thanks for the responses. Flowblade looks interesting.it's got a new release out at 1.8; 1.6 on SBo and I wonder if dependencies have changed for that update too - will have a more detailed look. On SBo it makes reference to requiring gnome* dependencies (gnome-python

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-23 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2016-10-22 10:07 GMT+02:00 : > Good morning everyone > > Is it likely that we will see a move towards the latest release of Openshot > please? > > I am asking because I wondered, not withstanding and respecting maintainers' > time constraints etc, if one of the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-23 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2016-10-22 10:07 GMT+02:00 : > Good morning everyone > > Is it likely that we will see a move towards the latest release of Openshot > please? > > I am asking because I wondered, not withstanding and respecting maintainers' > time constraints etc, if one of the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-22 Thread JCA
On this subject, it would be nice to have a free video editor with frame-accurate capabilities when dealing with H.264 (or HVAC) videos. Such things seem to exist for Windows (at least for H.264) and probably Mac, but not for Linux, AFAIK. On Oct 22, 2016 4:22 PM, "Fernando Lopez"

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-22 Thread Fernando Lopez
what about cinelerra? On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 22/10/2016 à 10:07, b...@shroggslodge.freeserve.co.uk a écrit : > > Is it likely that we will see a move towards the latest release of > > Openshot please? > > I had the same question

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-22 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 22/10/2016 à 10:07, b...@shroggslodge.freeserve.co.uk a écrit : > Is it likely that we will see a move towards the latest release of > Openshot please? I had the same question recently. Openshot is a nifty little application, but unfortunately it's not exactly a stable one and indeed very

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-22 Thread 414N
Hi Habs, it seems that they're distributing the latest versions as AppImages, so there's no strict need to build a dedicated Slackware package if all you want is to test a new release. Compiling from source seems to now requires an additional effort, as dependencies are now split in several

[Slackbuilds-users] Openshot

2016-10-22 Thread bch
Good morning everyone Is it likely that we will see a move towards the latest release of Openshot please? I am asking because I wondered, not withstanding and respecting maintainers' time constraints etc, if one of the issues would be that there has been some fundamental changes to the latest

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-31 Thread stormtracknole
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Antonio Hernández Blas hba.nihilis...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr wrote: I suggest to apply the KISS principle and to simply add something like this to the README:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-17 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 17/03/2013 00:22, Antonio Hernández Blas a écrit : Yeah, based on xgizzmo's words [1] it is left up to the maintainer... so we are left with inconsistency. I suggest to apply the KISS principle and to simply add something like this to the README:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-17 Thread Antonio Hernández Blas
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr wrote: I suggest to apply the KISS principle and to simply add something like this to the README: http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.0/desktop/ccsm/ Yeah, another good one is

[Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-16 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, Some time ago, I installed Openshot from SBo and couldn't manage to get it to work correctly, even though all listed dependencies were installed. After some experimentation, I found out the culprit: 'frei0r' must be installed *before* 'mlt', so it can be taken into account. Otherwise

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-16 Thread Matteo Bernardini
I was thinking that maybe a cleaner alternative solution could be to add frei0r in the REQUIRES of mlt.info, if it's ok for the maintainer. Matteo P.S. Here I also version-bumped mlt to 0.8.8. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-16 Thread Christoph Willing
On 16/03/2013, at 4:42 PM, Antonio Hernández Blas hba.nihilis...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] The variable REQUIRES (in openshot.info) has frei0r mlt pygoocanvas pyxdg as value so it is indicating the correct build order ;) The $PRGNAM.info specification does not stipulate that entries in the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-16 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 16/03/2013 10:13, Christoph Willing a écrit : If frei0r is already required for mlt, then the inclusion of frei0r in openshot.info is incorrect The thing is: it's not. The 'mlt' package will build just fine without frei0r (and just note the absence of frei0r in the ./configure process).

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-16 Thread Matteo Bernardini
If stormstracknole prefer to keep things as they are, I can add a note like this to the README NOTE: to use frei0r plugins in openshot, it's mandatory to build mlt with frei0r already installed. But I think mlt can benefit from default frei0r support, so I still like the other solution more :)

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-16 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 16/03/2013 10:43, Matteo Bernardini a écrit : But I think mlt can benefit from default frei0r support, so I still like the other solution more :) Not only does it benefit from mlt support. It also sends annoying error messages on startup that can't be disabled. -- Microlinux - Solutions

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot, mlt and frei0r

2013-03-16 Thread Antonio Hernández Blas
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Christoph Willing c.will...@uq.edu.au wrote: The $PRGNAM.info specification does not stipulate that entries in the REQUIRED field should be in build order and I'm happy with that. Yeah, based on xgizzmo's words [1] it is left up to the maintainer... so we are

[Slackbuilds-users] Openshot and Dep's updates

2010-03-20 Thread Jonathan Larsen
I've updated Openshot, MLT and all the other slackbuilds that those require, to be compliant with bash 4. Openshot and MLT were already submitted by me a couple weeks back for some script fixes, so I can't update the new revision. Can someone remove those please? Openshot is now at version

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Openshot and Dep's updates

2010-03-20 Thread Erik Hanson
On Mar 20, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Jonathan Larsen wrote: I've updated Openshot, MLT and all the other slackbuilds that those require, to be compliant with bash 4. Openshot and MLT were already submitted by me a couple weeks back for some script fixes, so I can't update the new revision. Can