Okay, then yes, absolutely. Go for it.
-RW
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:40:42 -0400
"Andrew Payne" wrote:
> That's right, binary straight from official Pandoc project,
> repackaged for Slackware.
>
> (Sorry for the duplicate Robby, I didn't reply-all)
>
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:26:18 -0400
> >
That's right, binary straight from official Pandoc project, repackaged for
Slackware.
(Sorry for the duplicate Robby, I didn't reply-all)
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:26:18 -0400
> "Andrew Payne" wrote:
>
>> Hi all, I made a slackbuild for the binary of pandoc. The
>> build-from-source version
Rich, I used to steal a binary (pandoc-static) from Fedora repos and it
worked nicely.
It seems pandoc releases a binary these days themselves, though (which
hopefully is what Andrew has packaged).
Nobody should ever have to live without pandoc :-)
On 2019-03-18 12:31, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:26:18 -0400
"Andrew Payne" wrote:
> Hi all, I made a slackbuild for the binary of pandoc. The
> build-from-source version exists on SBo, but given the daunting build
> time and the massive list of Haskell dependencies, I think a binary
> build would be a valuable
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019, Andrew Payne wrote:
Hi all, I made a slackbuild for the binary of pandoc. The
build-from-source version exists on SBo, but given the daunting build time
and the massive list of Haskell dependencies, I think a binary build would
be a valuable alternative. I know this
Hi all, I made a slackbuild for the binary of pandoc. The
build-from-source version exists on SBo, but given the daunting build time
and the massive list of Haskell dependencies, I think a binary build would
be a valuable alternative. I know this parallel scenario exists with
LibreOffice for
