On 6/14/18, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> Do I just need to do the nuclear option of deleting my GitHub fork
> and creating a new fork and then setting up a new clone?
Just did this, at sbosrcarch. The archive is still sitting at 99.9%
complete...
___
SlackBu
Thanks, David.
I followed your commands and everything looks proper in the master
branch and I simply deleted the already merged local branches on GitHub,
so that should be clean now.
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this i
> Hi Nate, Hi everybody,
>
> On 14/06/18 13:39, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> * On 2018 13 Jun 16:05 -0500, Matteo Bernardini wrote:
>>> git checkout master
>>> git fetch --all
>>> git reset --hard origin/master
>> I did those commands and still have the files remaining in my local
>> tree.
> Sorry about
Hi Nate, Hi everybody,
On 14/06/18 13:39, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2018 13 Jun 16:05 -0500, Matteo Bernardini wrote:
>> git checkout master
>> git fetch --all
>> git reset --hard origin/master
>
> I did those commands and still have the files remaining in my local
> tree.
Sorry about that, we
* On 2018 13 Jun 16:05 -0500, Matteo Bernardini wrote:
> git checkout master
> git fetch --all
> git reset --hard origin/master
I did those commands and still have the files remaining in my local
tree.
I had not WIP so I was sync'ed with Willy's 2 June update. Do I just
need to do the nuclear op
13 Ιουν 2018, 6:11 μμ, ο/η Greg' Ar Tourter έγραψε:
> I just received a dmca takedown notice for my slackbuild repo copy on github
> (I looking at the document, I am not the only one from this community).
>
> It seems that steinberg is claiming jack-tools and anything related to it is
> affec
On 6/13/18, Matteo Bernardini wrote:
> of their commits, move them somewhere handy to reapply them later over
> a new checkout -b of the new master branch that you will have to
> update with
OK. After all this is done, *then* I'll commit a new jack-tools that
doesn't include the steinberg header
2018-06-13 21:08 GMT+02:00 B Watson :
> On 6/13/18, Matteo Bernardini wrote:
>> 2018-06-13 17:26 GMT+02:00 Greg' Ar Tourter :
>>> That repo is also on the takedown list!
>>
>> in that case maybe dropping the jack-lxvst stuff may be more
>> appropriate: from the SlackBuild
>>
>> # - Added VST heade
I do this in an application that requires the SDK:
https://github.com/rodlie/airwave/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L65
Basically just extract the zip, run the mac shell script to fix include (or
do it manually, it's just a move command), then add the path to the
includes in the build script.
On Wed,
2018-06-13 17:26 GMT+02:00 Greg' Ar Tourter :
> That repo is also on the takedown list!
in that case maybe dropping the jack-lxvst stuff may be more
appropriate: from the SlackBuild
# - Added VST headers to get jack-lxvst to build. Not sure the
# licensing status of these, but they were cloned
And yeah I looked at the slackbuild after I sent my original email and
noticed the 2 header files. I had not realised there were there.
On 13 June 2018 at 16:26, Greg' Ar Tourter wrote:
> That repo is also on the takedown list!
>
> On 13 June 2018 at 16:22, Matteo Bernardini
> wrote:
>
>> 2018-
The header will sooner or later be removed as well, due too license issues.
You should just point to the official SDK download page and/or add an
additional download with full url to the SDK (note that that link must be
maintained).
You could also just use something like SDK_FILE= variable in
the
That repo is also on the takedown list!
On 13 June 2018 at 16:22, Matteo Bernardini
wrote:
> 2018-06-13 17:11 GMT+02:00 Greg' Ar Tourter :
> > I just received a dmca takedown notice for my slackbuild repo copy on
> > github (I looking at the document, I am not the only one from this
> > communi
2018-06-13 17:11 GMT+02:00 Greg' Ar Tourter :
> I just received a dmca takedown notice for my slackbuild repo copy on
> github (I looking at the document, I am not the only one from this
> community).
>
> It seems that steinberg is claiming jack-tools and anything related to it is
> affected.
>
>
I just received a dmca takedown notice for my slackbuild repo copy on
github (I looking at the document, I am not the only one from this
community).
It seems that steinberg is claiming jack-tools and anything related to it
is affected.
Should we respond as a group or as individual? In this case
15 matches
Mail list logo
