* On 2017 02 May 11:49 -0500, Habs wrote:
> Thank you for the reply. Ahh I see. I had it in my mind that
> upstream/devs would post a [sourse] release as such with some checksum,
> so that when it arrived elsewhere it could be validated (as best one
> can) to not have been meddled with.
Some sit
On Tue, 2 May 2017 12:28:46 -0400
B Watson wrote:
> On 5/2/17, General wrote:
> >
> > Which leads me to another [general] question: when getting a
> > source of Github (of which I am not too familiar) , what happens in
> > terms of process that leads to the md5sum's on the
> > slackbuilds.org..
On 5/2/17, General wrote:
>
> Which leads me to another [general] question: when getting a source of
> Github (of which I am not too familiar) , what happens in terms of process
> that leads to the md5sum's on the slackbuilds.org. I could not see any
> published [by the developers] any checks
