On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:01:47PM -0400,
lists.secondlife@trap.wereanimal.net wrote:
> install. My entire system is split-debug, so when I do a bt, it goes all the
> way back. I also use -ggdb in make.conf
Wow :p
Make that 99.9% in my previous post - lol.
I'm amazed!
--
Carlo Wood
_
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:17:10PM -0400, Jason Giglio wrote:
> GDB Backtrace on an *unstripped* binary, along with a little about what
> you were doing when it happened, is probably enough info to fix 80% of
> the bugs.
I disagree. Most crashes happen in third party libraries.
The crashes that la
On Friday 24 April 2009 12:17:10 pm Jason Giglio wrote:
> GDB Backtrace on an *unstripped* binary, along with a little about what
> you were doing when it happened, is probably enough info to fix 80% of
> the bugs.
>
Due to a bug in the cmake build system, the strippped binary is not created,
so
GDB Backtrace on an *unstripped* binary, along with a little about what
you were doing when it happened, is probably enough info to fix 80% of
the bugs.
What I do to make an unstripped binary is to change the strip command in
the makefiles to a cp command. This way I know it's exactly the same
bu
On Thursday 23 April 2009 11:53:58 am Robin Cornelius wrote:
>
> I think also we need to monitor the crash rate and the bug reports
> coming in. In theory once all bugs of a certain severity or greater
> are tackled and the crash rate has reached an appropriate lull we can
> declare "good enough".
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Philippe Bossut (Merov Linden)
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
>> How will we know when we're "done"?
>
> I'm tempted to answer "define 'done'" though that's not very
> constructive :)
>
I think we have a pretty well defined
Hi guys,
On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> How will we know when we're "done"?
I'm tempted to answer "define 'done'" though that's not very
constructive :)
Since we have nightly builds, that notion of a done viewer only
applies to "the OS viewer", the one that gets stamped
Rob, When PN's become available for this branch will notices be posted to
the BSI and/or sldev lists so that we can easily keep up with them? Thanks.
-G.W.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've filed the following issue in JIRA:
>
> "Write up QA process for
Hi folks,
I've filed the following issue in JIRA:
"Write up QA process for new http-texture branch viewer"
https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-12931
...which is on my plate to write up. However, I'm looking for community
input on this.
One thing we're not currently planning on doing is sub
