RE: slide DB schema

2005-03-15 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
I'm sorry Warwick, A star configuration means that our db schema is based in a set of relational tables, that when drawn together seem like a star. For example, imagine the xyz coordinates along the time dimension. We could draw something like this for a datawarehouse: Table X

RE: slide DB schema

2005-03-15 Thread Warwick Burrows
Miguel, For those of us who don't know: what is a "star configuration"? Thanks, Warwick > -Original Message- > Hello Carlos, > > After a little time working the insides of the standard > rdbms adaptor, I've found out that, like you're stating, that > those two tables are not redund

RE: slide DB schema

2005-03-15 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hello Carlos, After a little time working the insides of the standard rdbms adaptor, I've found out that, like you're stating, that those two tables are not redundant, but required. That troubles me immensely since an operation in a directory might influence its children. The Slide implementatio

Re: slide DB schema

2005-03-11 Thread Carlos Villegas
As I understand, binding and parent_binding are used to implement the resource hierarchy (parent/child relationships) and both are always required. They have nothing to do with the binding concept in the WebDAV spec. The table LINKS is what implements the binding functionality in the spec. If b

slide DB schema

2005-03-11 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hello folks, We are in the process of creating an optimized postgres adapter. While analyzing the slide's DB schema we found out that there are two tables that seem to be redundant: * the binding table: CREATE TABLE BINDING ( URI_ID integer NOT NULL R