Hmmm....

I believe that you are not the only one to report these problems. I think it
might be time to look into it more seriously. I think last time the test was
with 100s of files, and they were all in one directory. Your test uses 1000s
of files, in a directory structure.
Last time some profiling was done, and the guilty method was found, and
patched, leading to a large performance increase if I remember correctly.

I would propose:
 * We consolidate the changes everyone is currently working on, and finally
produce a 2.0 BETA release.
 * We create some docs for the 2.0 release, and get it on the site.
 * This will create some more testers, since many people have trouble with
the CVS version and are discouraged.
 * We create a couple of reference file collections with which we can test
slide's speed.
 * This will enable a larger number of testers to run their installations
against the same test cases. We can then get an idea of what impact the
different parameters of operating system, java version, servlet container
and store configuration have on the speed, and where we need to fix things
to make it useable.



Richie










> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Sean Qi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 16. November 2002 02:00
> An: Slide Developers Mailing List; Slide Users Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: Performance issue
> 
> 
> I forgot to mention that I was trying to move the Slide 
> source direcotry
> which you get from Slide's CVS to slide.  In other words, the 
> 170MB consists
> of hundreds of files.
> 
> When I put one SINGLE file of 44 MB, it only take 15 seconds.
> 
> Any input?
> 
> Sean Q
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Slide Developers Mailing List" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Slide
> Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:25 PM
> Subject: Performance issue
> 
> 
> > Hi, All,
> >
> > Has anyone tested Slide's performance or run into some issues in the
> > performance area?
> >
> > I just did a test as follows:
> >
> > 1.  Configure Slide to use JDBCDescriptorStore as nodestore and
> > FileContentStore as the content store.
> > 2.  Start Tomcat (4.1) with Slide deployed in webapps on my 
> local machine
> > (W2K Professional).
> > 3.  Used Windows Explorer as the WebDav client to 
> copy/paste 170M files
> from
> > my local drive to Slide.
> > 4.  It seemed that it took forever to finish the copy.  I 
> finally ran out
> of
> > patience and stopped the copying.  It turned out that in 
> approximately 40
> > minutes, only 9.8 M files were copied over to slide.
> > After some math, I realized the speed is only 4K/second.  
> It is too slow.
> >
> > Is this an inherited "problem" with Slide or something 
> could be done to
> > improve it?
> >
> > Any input isappreciated.
> >
> > Sean Q.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to