Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-04 Thread Carlos Villegas
Oliver Zeigermann wrote: On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:37:20 +0900, Carlos Villegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oliver Zeigermann wrote: OK, I will remove the author tags then. Concerning DAO, I was talking about the general concept, while you seem to think about the Spring implementation. Is that right? W

Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-04 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:37:20 +0900, Carlos Villegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > OK, I will remove the author tags then. Concerning DAO, I was talking > > about the general concept, while you seem to think about the Spring > > implementation. Is that right? > > > > Wel

Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-04 Thread Carlos Villegas
Oliver Zeigermann wrote: OK, I will remove the author tags then. Concerning DAO, I was talking about the general concept, while you seem to think about the Spring implementation. Is that right? Well I was just saying that in this imperfect world you can't just map any object to a relational model.

Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-04 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
OK, I will remove the author tags then. Concerning DAO, I was talking about the general concept, while you seem to think about the Spring implementation. Is that right? Anyway, this is our TODO-List, right? - Content support - Native Sequence support - Compatibility with the old scheme (maybe usin

Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-04 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:48:58 +0900, Carlos Villegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wondering, any reason why xdoclet 1.2.1 was used instead of 1.2.2 ? > Though it doesn't seem to affect the ojbdoclet task at all, it works > just the same. Just because I am lazy, it was the version that came alo

Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-02 Thread Carlos Villegas
Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Hi Carlos, happy new year for to you as well! Thanks for the contribution - I have already committed it to the Slide CVS. Could you please check if the committed stuff looks ok to you? It's ok, it builds fine and works, at least to the point I tested it. Just wondering, an

Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-02 Thread Carlos Villegas
Hi, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Carlos! First of all I must say that I am very impressed by your work! Thanks again, Carlos! I am pretty sure many people will benefit from your contribution. Anyway, I had a closer look at all this and now have some questions. Please take them as questions of someone w

Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-02 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Carlos! First of all I must say that I am very impressed by your work! Thanks again, Carlos! I am pretty sure many people will benefit from your contribution. Anyway, I had a closer look at all this and now have some questions. Please take them as questions of someone who wants to understand and

Re: OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-02 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Hi Carlos, happy new year for to you as well! Thanks for the contribution - I have already committed it to the Slide CVS. Could you please check if the committed stuff looks ok to you? I will have a closer look at this in the following days and would be glad if you would help me getting started

OJB store initial implementation

2005-01-02 Thread Carlos Villegas
Happy New Year, As promised, I've submitted an initial implementation of a slide store based on Apache OJB O/R tool. I created a new bug report in bugzilla (Bug 32913) and attached the files. I've implemented all stores except the content store. Need more time to think about it. The BLOB type is