m Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: Security Performance
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 16:14, Jim Myers wrote:
Ah - OK. I think you could still create the getEffectiveAcl method
signature
and add a default implementation to the base store(s) -
Abs
e effectiveAcl somewhere
> along with a matching getEffectiveAcl method.
>
> Does this make sense or have I missed your point?
>
> Jim
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "James Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jim Myers" <[EMAIL
es this make sense or have I missed your point?
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "James Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: Security Performance
On Thu, 2004-10-0
nformation being stored. #2 and #3 both
> >>require that grant/revoke be modified to store the effectiveAcl somewhere
> >>along with a matching getEffectiveAcl method.
> >>
> >>Does this make sense or have I missed your point?
> >>
> >> Jim
>
